How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Long exact sequence in group cohomology
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and fix supplied injective resolution data on all left -modules. A short exact sequence of left -modules induces a natural long exact sequence
Proof
Given: The displayed short exact sequence.
Invariants are left exact. Under the stated Choice and supplied-resolution hypotheses, Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor makes their right derived functors a cohomological delta functor.
Its connecting maps give precisely the displayed sequence after the definition of is substituted; delta-functor naturality gives naturality.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, §6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)