How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mean and variance under balanced biological and technical replication
Statement
Assume the balanced model of Biological and technical replication model, with , and set For a fixed treatment schedule , If instead is square-integrable and random under the assignment-averaged law, then Thus, when is independent of and , the assignment contribution is . If, in addition, the are mutually independent with common variance , the full variance is . Without independence of the treatment average from , the two covariance terms remain. No Gaussian assumption is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite balanced model and the random-variable conventions in Biological and technical replication model. For the second branch, has finite second moments under the declared assignment law.
Biological and technical replication model: ; the and have zero means, common variances and , and the complete finite family of biological and technical random variables is mutually independent.
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: for square-integrable real random variables, variance is the expectation of the centered square and covariance is the expectation of the product of centered variables.
Covariance is symmetric and bilinear in finite linear combinations: covariance expands bilinearly over finite linear combinations of square-integrable random variables.
Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables: products of independent integrable real random variables are integrable and their expectations factor.
Independent random elements: mutual independence means the generated sigma-algebras form an independent family; the random variables in [F1] therefore satisfy the independence hypothesis of [F4].
Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation: expectation is linear for finite linear combinations of integrable random variables.
Proof
Given: The assumptions in [F1], , and, in the random-treatment branch, a square-integrable treatment-contribution vector.
Summing the model in [F1] over gives . Each summand is integrable, so [F6] and the zero means in [F1] give when is fixed, and when it is random.
For distinct biological indices , distinct technical indices , and any biological-technical pair , the variables in each pair are independent by [F1] and [F5]. They are integrable because they are square-integrable. Applying [F4] to identity functions gives expectation of the product equal to the product of their zero means; [F2] therefore makes every such off-diagonal covariance zero. By [F3], bilinearity over the finite index families then gives .
Bilinearity [F3] expands into covariance terms with coefficient . By 1.2 the off-diagonal terms vanish, and the diagonal terms equal by [F1] and [F2]. Hence .
Bilinearity [F3] expands into covariance terms with coefficient . By 1.2 the off-diagonal terms vanish, and the diagonal terms equal by [F1] and [F2]. Hence .
With fixed , is constant and has zero covariance with every square-integrable random variable by [F2]. Expand the variance of using [F3]; its cross-covariance is zero by 1.2. Substituting 2.1 and 2.2 proves the fixed-schedule formula.
With random , expand the variance of by [F3]. The - covariance is zero by 1.2, and 2.1–2.2 give the two component variances, yielding exactly the displayed general formula with both treatment cross-covariances retained. If is independent of and , [F4] makes those cross-covariances zero. Expanding by [F3] gives the stated covariance sum; when the are mutually independent with common variance , only its diagonal terms remain, giving .
Remarks
The proof uses only finite sums and moment identities, so it is choice-free. The assignment contribution is not generally : under a constrained or otherwise dependent assignment law, its covariance sum must be evaluated under that law. The identity is conditional on the stated model assumptions; it does not validate them or provide an exact normal inference procedure.
Depends on
- Biological and technical replication model
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Covariance is symmetric and bilinear in finite linear combinations
- Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables
- Independent random elements
- Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gary W. Oehlert, A First Course in Design and Analysis of Experiments, Chapter 1 §1.5, printed pp. 8–10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Susan Holmes and Wolfgang Huber, Modern Statistics for Modern Biology, Chapter 13 §§13.3.2, 13.4.2, 13.4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)