How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A verified MGRIT error-matrix contraction controls error and residual
Statement
Let be the fine-grid system from The all-at-once bidiagonal time operator and C/F points. By Eliminating F-points gives the exact coarse time operator, is invertible. Let be the exact error matrix for one fixed two-level cycle in A declared two-level MGRIT coarse-correction cycle. Choose a real-valued norm on and define its induced operator norm by . Assume and are finite for this norm. If a direct calculation or other proof establishes , then after cycles the error satisfies , with the convention . The residual obeys , and for every error/residual pair,
The contraction hypothesis is a property to prove for the declared operators, norm, and cycle. The MGRIT name alone supplies no such bound, and this theorem makes no multilevel convergence claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite linear time system, the declared exact two-level cycle and a chosen product-space norm.
A declared two-level MGRIT coarse-correction cycle: one cycle has error matrix .
Eliminating F-points gives the exact coarse time operator: the fine-grid operator is invertible.
A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms: the chosen vector norm separates zero: if and only if .
The directly calculated or proved induced norm satisfies .
The induced norms and are finite for the chosen product-space norm.
Proof
By [F1], one cycle sends the current error to .
At the claimed inequality is equality. If the bound holds at and , [F3] gives and the next bound follows. If , the induced-norm definition in the Statement and [A1] give . Induction proves the error bound for every .
Since , subtraction gives . If , [F3] gives . Otherwise the induced-norm definition in the Statement and [A2] give , and step 2.1 yields the displayed residual estimate.
For any error/residual pair, and [F2] gives . If , then and [F3] gives both inequalities. If , invertibility forces , so the induced-norm definition in the Statement and [A2] give both and .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. D. Falgout, S. Friedhoff, Tz. V. Kolev, S. P. MacLachlan, and J. B. Schroder, Parallel Time Integration with Multigrid (standard reference, not scraped)
- V. A. Dobrev, Tz. Kolev, N. A. Petersson, and J. B. Schroder, Two-Level Convergence Theory for Multigrid Reduction in Time (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ben S. Southworth, Necessary Conditions and Tight Two-Level Convergence Bounds for Parareal and Multigrid Reduction in Time (standard reference, not scraped)