Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite LLE affine least-squares weights have a unique minimum-norm minimizer

Statement

Fix xi∈Rp and a nonempty finite neighbor list Ni=(j1,…,jk) of distinct indices. The constrained problem

min⁡w∈Rk∥xi−∑s=1kwsxjs∥22subject to∑s=1kws=1

has a nonempty affine set of minimizers, and exactly one member of that set has smallest Euclidean norm. Thus the minimum-norm rule in finite LLE defines one weight vector even when the local covariance matrix is singular. This conclusion uses no choice axiom.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed point xi∈Rp and a nonempty finite ordered list Ni=(j1,…,jk).

[F1]

The LLE weight problem minimizes the local reconstruction error under the affine constraint ∑sws=1, then selects a minimizer of least Euclidean norm (Minimum-norm affine reconstruction weights for a finite LLE neighborhood).

[F4]

A subspace of a finite-dimensional inner-product space and its orthogonal complement give a direct-sum decomposition (For a subspace W of a finite-dimensional inner product space, V=W⊕W⊥).

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Let w0=(1,0,…,0)∈Rk, let L={z∈Rk:∑szs=0}, and define T:L→Rp by Tz=∑szsxjs. Every feasible w has a unique form w=w0+z with z∈L, and its residual is xi−xj1−Tz. Thus the constrained problem is an ordinary finite-dimensional least-squares problem for T on the inner-product subspace L.

2.1step 1.1F2choosealgebra

By [F2], choose a least-squares minimizer z0∈L and all minimizers are z0+N, where N=ker⁡T⊆L. Therefore all feasible minimizing weights form the nonempty affine set w0+z0+N. In the degenerate case T=0, z0=0 is a minimizer and N=L, so this set contains every feasible weight.

3.1step 2.1F3F4algebra

Put w∗=w0+z0. By [F4], decompose w∗=u+v with u∈N and v∈N⊥ in Rk. Since −u∈N, v=w∗−u remains in the affine minimizer set. For any other minimizer v+h with h∈N, orthogonality gives ∥v+h∥22=∥v∥22+∥h∥22, which is at least ∥v∥22 with equality only if h=0. Hence v is the unique minimum-norm minimizer. When k=1, L=N={0} and this gives the unique feasible weight w0=(1).

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The proof applies the least-squares existence result once to this fixed finite-dimensional problem and uses a finite orthogonal decomposition; it selects no sequence of approximate minimizers and uses no Countable Choice.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Minimum-norm affine reconstruction weights for a finite LLE neighborhood.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources