How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Minkowski convex-body theorem, strict form
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , let be a full lattice with (Full Euclidean lattice and covolume), and let be Lebesgue measurable, convex and centrally symmetric (A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points). If
then contains a nonzero point of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a full lattice with , and a Lebesgue measurable convex centrally symmetric set with .
The Axiom of Choice gives the Axiom of Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice), the choice hypothesis of the scaling fact [F2], invoked in step 1.1; Blichfeldt's principle [F1] is applied under the Axiom of Choice assumed in the statement, and no further choice is used.
Blichfeldt's principle: for a Lebesgue measurable with there are distinct with (Blichfeldt lattice-point principle).
For a nonzero real , a set is Lebesgue measurable if and only if is, and then (For a nonzero real , dilation by multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by , and reflection in the origin preserves it).
convex means for all and ; central symmetry means , so whenever (A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points).
Proof
Put . By [F2] with , is Lebesgue measurable with , the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F2] being supplied by [A1].
is convex and centrally symmetric: for write , with ; then by convexity of , and by symmetry of .
By [F1] applied to the measurable set of step 1.1 there are distinct with .
The difference is nonzero because , and it lies in : and by definition of , so by central symmetry, and convexity of gives .
Thus is a nonzero point of lying in , as required.
Remarks
The factor is optimal for centrally symmetric convex bodies: for the open cube and one has while , so the strict inequality cannot be weakened to . The equality case for compact bodies is treated in the next item, where the strict form is applied to the dilates .
Depends on
- Blichfeldt lattice-point principle
- A convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^m$ contains every line segment between two of its points
- For a nonzero real $c$, dilation by $c$ multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by $|c|^n$, and reflection in the origin preserves it
- Full Euclidean lattice and covolume
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory v3.08 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad and Aaron Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)