Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Minkowski convex-body theorem, strict form

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let n≥1, let Λ⊆Rn be a full lattice with covol⁡(Λ)>0 (Full Euclidean lattice and covolume), and let C⊆Rn be Lebesgue measurable, convex and centrally symmetric (A convex subset of Rm contains every line segment between two of its points). If

λn(C)>2ncovol⁡(Λ),

then C contains a nonzero point of Λ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a full lattice Λ with covol⁡(Λ)>0, and a Lebesgue measurable convex centrally symmetric set C with λn(C)>2ncovol⁡(Λ).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice gives the Axiom of Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice), the choice hypothesis of the scaling fact [F2], invoked in step 1.1; Blichfeldt's principle [F1] is applied under the Axiom of Choice assumed in the statement, and no further choice is used.

[F1]

Blichfeldt's principle: for a Lebesgue measurable S⊆Rn with λn(S)>covol⁡(Λ) there are distinct x,y∈S with x−y∈Λ (Blichfeldt lattice-point principle).

[F2]

For a nonzero real c, a set E is Lebesgue measurable if and only if cE is, and then λn(cE)=∣c∣nλn(E) (For a nonzero real c, dilation by c multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by ∣c∣n, and reflection in the origin preserves it).

[F3]

C convex means (1−t)x+ty∈C for all x,y∈C and t∈[0,1]; central symmetry means −C=C, so −y∈C whenever y∈C (A convex subset of Rm contains every line segment between two of its points).

Proof

1.1F2A1given

Put C′:=12C={x/2:x∈C}. By [F2] with c=1/2, C′ is Lebesgue measurable with λn(C′)=2−nλn(C)>covol⁡(Λ), the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F2] being supplied by [A1].

1.2F3algebra

C′ is convex and centrally symmetric: for u,v∈C′ write u=x/2, v=y/2 with x,y∈C; then (1−t)u+tv=((1−t)x+ty)/2∈C′ by convexity of C, and −u=(−x)/2∈C′ by symmetry of C.

2.1F1step 1.1

By [F1] applied to the measurable set C′ of step 1.1 there are distinct u,v∈C′ with u−v∈Λ.

3.1F3step 2.1

The difference u−v is nonzero because u≠v, and it lies in C: 2u∈C and 2v∈C by definition of C′, so −2v∈C by central symmetry, and convexity of C gives u−v=12(2u)+12(−2v)∈C.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Thus u−v is a nonzero point of Λ lying in C, as required.

Remarks

The factor 2n is optimal for centrally symmetric convex bodies: for the open cube C=(−1,1)n and Λ=Zn one has λn(C)=2n=2ncovol⁡(Λ) while C∩Zn={0}, so the strict inequality cannot be weakened to ≥. The equality case for compact bodies is treated in the next item, where the strict form is applied to the dilates (1+1/m)C.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources