How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Modular simple modules of the symmetric group
Statement
Let be a prime, let , and let be a splitting -modular system for , so that is a splitting field of characteristic for and all its subgroups (A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras). For a partition let be the modular Specht quotient of Modular Specht form and radical quotient, defined using the reduced integral tabloid form on .
- Simple heads. If is -regular, then is self-dual and absolutely irreducible, and it is the simple head of , whose unique maximal submodule is . If is not -regular, then .
- Pairwise inequivalent. If are both -regular and as -modules, then .
- Complete set. Every simple -module is isomorphic to for exactly one -regular partition . Equivalently, as ranges over the -regular partitions of , the modules form a complete set of representatives of the isomorphism classes of simple -modules; in particular the number of simple -modules equals the number of -regular partitions of .
No absolutely irreducible module outside the family is constructed, and the statement asserts nothing about fields that are not splitting fields for . The proof uses no averaging and no division by a group order, and the case and characteristic are included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime , an integer , a splitting -modular system for , and the objects above.
is -regular if and only if for every , where is the number of parts of equal to (p-regular and p-restricted partitions).
For every field of characteristic the form quotient of Modular Specht form and radical quotient satisfies: if and only if is not -regular; and if is -regular then is self-dual and absolutely irreducible, is the unique maximal submodule of and equals , and is the simple head of (Nonzero modular Specht quotient criterion, The radical, socle, head, and Loewy series of a finite-dimensional module).
If has characteristic , is -regular, and for some , then is -regular and (Nonzero maps into tabloid quotients force dominance).
An element is -regular, i.e. , if and only if no cycle length in its disjoint-cycle decomposition is divisible by (p-regular and p-singular elements, Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).
The order of a permutation is the least positive common multiple of its nontrivial cycle lengths, and for the identity (The order of a permutation is the least positive common multiple of its nontrivial cycle lengths, with value for the identity); as is prime, divides such a least common multiple if and only if it divides one of the cycle lengths.
Conjugacy classes of are in bijection with the tuples of nonnegative integers with , the class of corresponding to its cycle type orbits of of size (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with , Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).
For a finite group over a splitting field of characteristic , the number of isomorphism classes of simple -modules equals the number of -regular conjugacy classes of (The number of simple kG-modules equals the number of p-regular conjugacy classes).
Proof
Fix a partition . By [F2] applied to : if and only if is not -regular, and if is -regular then is self-dual and absolutely irreducible, is the unique maximal submodule of , and is the simple head of . This is assertion 1.
By [F4] and [F5], is -regular if and only if no cycle length of is divisible by ; in the cycle-type notation of [F6] this says whenever .
We prove the generating-function identity in the formal power series ring , coefficient by coefficient. Fix and use in : because the factors with and occur in numerator and denominator and cancel. Every factor of the first product after the cancellation has exponent , so the product is modulo . Therefore the two sides of the displayed identity have equal coefficients of for every : taking and reducing the finite truncations modulo shows that any coefficient of is a finite sum of 's on both sides.
By [F6] the map sending a conjugacy class to the cycle type of any representative is a bijection onto the tuples with , and by step 1.2 a class is -regular exactly when its tuple satisfies for every divisible by . Such tuples are exactly the partitions of all of whose parts are not divisible by . Hence
The coefficient of in is the number of tuples with and ; only can contribute, so this is a finite count, and such a tuple records exactly the partition of in which the part occurs times. Hence this coefficient is the number of -regular partitions of . The coefficient of in is likewise the number of partitions of all of whose parts are not divisible by . By step 1.3 the two coefficients are equal, so
Every -regular gives a nonzero simple module by step 1.1, and distinct -regular partitions give non-isomorphic modules: if with -regular, then by [F3] applied to . Hence is an injection from the set of -regular partitions of into the set of isomorphism classes of simple -modules, and therefore the number of isomorphism classes of simple -modules is at least the number of -regular partitions of .
Combining steps 2.1 and 2.2 gives and by [F7] applied to the finite group over its splitting field this common number equals the number of isomorphism classes of simple -modules.
By step 3.1 the number of isomorphism classes of simple -modules equals the number of -regular partitions of , while step 2.3 exhibits an injection between the same two finite sets. An injection between finite sets of equal cardinality is a bijection, so every simple -module is isomorphic to for exactly one -regular . Combined with the self-duality and absolute irreducibility of step 1.1, this is assertions 2 and 3.
Assertion 1 is step 1.1, assertion 2 is step 2.3, and assertion 3 is step 4.1; no part of the argument assumes more about than that it is a splitting field of characteristic for and its subgroups. For there is exactly one partition, , of , and it is -regular by [F1]; has one element, of order , so its unique class is -regular and the counts hold; is the one simple -module. For the same count applies: the -regular partitions of are those with distinct parts, the -regular classes of are those with all cycle lengths odd, and both are counted by the same coefficient. All counting is coefficient-wise finite, and no step divides by , by a group order, or averages over a group.
Depends on
- Nonzero modular Specht quotient criterion
- Nonzero maps into tabloid quotients force dominance
- Modular Specht form and radical quotient
- A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras
- The radical, socle, head, and Loewy series of a finite-dimensional module
- p-regular and p-restricted partitions
- p-regular and p-singular elements
- Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type
- The order of a permutation is the least positive common multiple of its nontrivial cycle lengths, with value $1$ for the identity
- The conjugacy classes of $S_n$ are indexed by the tuples $(c_1,\ldots,c_n)$ with $\sum k c_k=n$
- The number of simple kG-modules equals the number of p-regular conjugacy classes
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. D. James, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 682, §10.2, Lemma 10.2, Theorem 11.5 and Theorem 11.1, printed pp. 36-37 and 39-41 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacey Law, notes by Leonard Tomczak, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups, Theorem 2.15 (Brauer) and Proposition 2.16, printed pp. 16-17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Craven, Groups, Geometries and Representation Theory, §2.3, Theorem 2.5 and Corollary 2.11, printed pp. 24-26 (standard reference, not scraped)