How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Decomposition matrices of S3 at p=2 and p=3
Example
Let and let be a splitting -modular system for . In the decomposition matrix of , with rows and columns the -regular labels ,
Thus for but for , while both matrices satisfy the dominance bound and the unitriangular shape of Dominance unitriangularity of the symmetric-group decomposition matrix.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime , a splitting -modular system for (A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras), the base-changed Specht modules for the three partitions , and the modular form quotients (Integral Specht lattice and base change, Modular Specht form and radical quotient).
For every field the images of the standard polytabloids form a -basis of (Integral Specht lattice and base change); the standard tableaux are , for , the single for and the single column for (Tableaux and standard tableaux). Hence and .
The -tabloids are , where is the tabloid with singleton second row , and they form a -basis of with ; the -tabloids reduce to the single tabloid of the one-row shape, and the -tabloids are the six orderings of (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules).
For a tableau one has and (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules). For and the column stabilizers are and , and both and have singleton second row ; hence and in over every field .
The integral tabloid form has the tabloids as an orthonormal basis, its scalar extension is symmetric and nondegenerate, and (Integral tabloid form and Specht Gram matrix, Modular Specht form and radical quotient).
For the -regular partitions of are and , while has and is -singular (p-regular and p-restricted partitions).
For a -regular the quotient is a nonzero simple -module; the modules over the -regular labels are pairwise non-isomorphic, they are self-dual and absolutely irreducible, and every simple -module is isomorphic to exactly one of them; for -singular one has (Modular simple modules of the symmetric group).
The decomposition numbers are indexed by all rows and the -regular columns ; the dominance bound unless , the diagonal for -regular , the lower unitriangular shape in decreasing lexicographic order, and with all hold (Dominance unitriangularity of the symmetric-group decomposition matrix, Decomposition numbers and the decomposition matrix, Dominance order on partitions).
The sign representation is the one-dimensional representation with (The sign representation of and the restriction of a representation to a subgroup); since , it is trivial in characteristic and nontrivial in characteristic . A one-dimensional -module is nonzero and has no proper nonzero subspace, so it is simple (Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule).
Verification
By [F2] and [F3], has -basis and has -basis , . Applying the orthonormal form of [F4], so .
The unique -tabloid is fixed by , so is the one-dimensional trivial module, and has rank ; over a field of characteristic the sign representation is trivial by [F8], and over a field of characteristic it is nontrivial. The column stabilizer of a -tableau is all of , and the single standard polytabloid is its six tabloid coefficients are at the six distinct orderings, so , and for the substitution gives Hence is the one-dimensional sign representation.
Reducing modulo : for the reduction has determinant , hence rank ; for the reduction is nonzero with determinant , hence rank , its columns being proportional. By the dimension formula of [F4], Also for both primes.
Let . Since by steps 2.1 and 1.1, the radical is zero and is simple by [F6]. Since , also , the trivial module, and by [F8] and step 1.2 the sign module satisfies . Therefore , ; , ; , , which is the matrix displayed for .
Let . Here is the trivial module of dimension by step 1.2 and step 2.1, and is a simple module of dimension that is not isomorphic to by [F6]. The sign module of step 1.2 is one-dimensional, hence simple by [F8], so it is isomorphic to or to by [F6]; it is nontrivial in characteristic by step 1.2, hence it is not and , so and . For , by [F3] because in characteristic ; here and for every by [F2], so is a one-dimensional trivial submodule of , isomorphic to . On the quotient , which is one-dimensional, the transposition acts by , since ; the quotient therefore is a nontrivial one-dimensional simple module, hence isomorphic to . Its dimension equals , so the composition factors of are and , each once: . With and from , this is the matrix displayed for .
Both matrices satisfy the constraints of [F7]. The forced zero holds in both, because ; the -regular diagonal entries hold in both; and with the -regular rows and columns in the decreasing lexicographic order the leading block is at and at , lower unitriangular in both cases. The entries of the row lie in allowed positions since is dominated by every partition of . The two matrices coincide with those recorded in the source reference for , and the position shows the characteristic dependence: at and at .
Depends on
- Integral Specht lattice and base change
- Integral tabloid form and Specht Gram matrix
- Modular Specht form and radical quotient
- Modular simple modules of the symmetric group
- Dominance unitriangularity of the symmetric-group decomposition matrix
- Decomposition numbers and the decomposition matrix
- The sign representation of $S_n$ and the restriction $\operatorname{Res}^G_H(V)$ of a representation to a subgroup
- p-regular and p-restricted partitions
- Dominance order on partitions
- Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules
- Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules
- Tableaux and standard tableaux
- A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras
- Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. D. James, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 682, Example 5.1, Theorem 12.1 and Example 12.4, printed pp. 18 and 42-43 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Craven, Groups, Geometries and Representation Theory, §2.3 and Exercise 2.4, printed pp. 23-25 (standard reference, not scraped)