Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Specht Gram rank for shape (2,2)

Example

Let λ=(2,2)⊢4, and let s1=1234,s2=1324 be the two standard λ-tableaux, written with the entries of the first row first; recall that a λ-tabloid is determined by the two row sets of size 2 (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules, Tableaux and standard tableaux). Then the integral Gram matrix of the standard polytabloids of shape (2,2) is G(2,2)=(β(esi,esj))i,j∈{1,2}=(4224)∈M2(Z), in the notation of Integral tabloid form and Specht Gram matrix. Consequently, for a prime p, a splitting field k of characteristic p for S4, and the modular quotient D(2,2)=Sk(2,2)/R(2,2) of Modular Specht form and radical quotient, dim⁡kD(2,2)=rank⁡k(G(2,2) mod p)={0,p=2,1,p=3,2,p>3. In particular, in characteristic 2 the Specht module Sk(2,2) is nonzero of dimension 2, while its invariant form is identically zero and its form quotient D(2,2) vanishes; this is the phenomenon that the prime-divisibility criterion for the Gram entries detects.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The partition λ=(2,2) of n=4 and its two standard tableaux s1,s2.

[F1]

A λ-tableau is a bijection from the cells of [λ] onto {1,…,4}; the λ-tabloid {t}={ρ⋅t:ρ∈Rt} is determined by its row sets, and distinct tabloids are distinct as pairs of row sets (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules, Tableaux and standard tableaux).

[F2]

κt=∑γ∈Ctsgn⁡(γ)γ and et=κt{t}=∑γ∈Ctsgn⁡(γ){γ⋅t}; Ct∩Rt={1}, so the tabloids {γ⋅t} for γ∈Ct are pairwise distinct and every coefficient of et lies in {0,1,−1} (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules).

[F3]

The integral tabloid form β has the tabloids as an orthonormal Z-basis, so β(∑TaTT,∑TbTT)=∑TaTbT for integer coefficients, and for every commutative ring R scalar extension gives the R-bilinear form βR with orthonormal tabloid basis (Integral tabloid form and Specht Gram matrix).

[F4]

The standard polytabloids of SZλ form a Z-basis, and for every commutative ring R the natural map R⊗ZSZλ→MRλ is injective onto the polytabloid span with the images of the standard polytabloids as basis (Integral Specht lattice and base change).

[F5]

For a splitting p-modular system (K,O,k) with the field k of characteristic p, the quotient Dλ=Skλ/Rλ satisfies dim⁡kDλ=rank⁡k(Gλ mod p), the rank of the reduction of the integral Gram matrix in the standard basis (Modular Specht form and radical quotient).

[F6]

The standard λ-tableaux are the tableaux strictly increasing along rows and down columns; for λ=(2,2) they are exactly s1=12/34 and s2=13/24 (Tableaux and standard tableaux).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2algebra

The column stabilizer of s1=12/34 is Cs1={1,(13),(24),(13)(24)}, and the four tabloids of its column orbit are pairwise distinct: 1 gives T1={{1,2},{3,4}}; (13) gives the tableau 32/14 with row sets {2,3},{1,4}, so {(13)s1}=T2={{2,3},{1,4}}; (24) gives 14/32 with row sets {1,4},{2,3}, so {(24)s1}=T3={{1,4},{2,3}}; and (13)(24) gives 34/12, so {(13)(24)s1}=T4={{3,4},{1,2}}. Hence es1=T1−T2−T3+T4. Similarly Cs2={1,(12),(34),(12)(34)} for s2=13/24: 1 gives U1={{1,3},{2,4}}; (12) gives 23/14, so T2; (34) gives 14/23, so T3; and (12)(34) gives 24/13, so U4={{2,4},{1,3}}. Hence es2=U1−T2−T3+U4. The tabloids T1,T2,T3,T4 are distinct, as are U1,T2,T3,U4, by [F1] and [F2].

2.1givenF2F3step 1.1algebra

Because the tabloid basis is orthonormal by [F3], a polytabloid whose expansion in tabloids has all coefficients in {0,1,−1} at pairwise distinct tabloids pairs with itself to the number of its nonzero terms; by step 1.1, β(es1,es1)=4 and β(es2,es2)=4. The supports of es1 and es2 meet exactly in the two tabloids T2 and T3, where the coefficients are −1 in both polytabloids, so β(es1,es2)=(−1)(−1)+(−1)(−1)=2; symmetry of β gives β(es2,es1)=2 as well. Therefore G(2,2)=(4224).

3.1givenF3step 2.1algebra

Let p be a prime and reduce the entries of G(2,2) modulo p. For p=2 all four entries vanish, so the reduced matrix is the zero matrix of rank 0. For p=3 the reduction is (1221), which is nonzero while its determinant 1⋅1−2⋅2=−3 vanishes, so its rank is 1; its first row is nonzero, and the two columns are proportional, which confirms the rank directly. For p>3 the determinant 12=22⋅3 is nonzero in k, so the rank is 2. The determinant and the largest nonvanishing minor of an integer matrix depend only on the characteristic of k, so the same answer holds for every field of the given characteristic.

4.1givenF4F5F6step 2.1step 3.1∎

By [F5] the dimension of the modular quotient D(2,2) over a splitting field k of characteristic p is the rank computed in step 3.1, namely 0 for p=2, 1 for p=3 and 2 for p>3. Finally, by [F4] the images of the standard polytabloids es1,es2 form a k-basis of Sk(2,2) for every field k, so dim⁡kSk(2,2)=2 in every characteristic; in characteristic 2, where the reduced Gram matrix vanishes and hence R(2,2)=Sk(2,2), this exhibits a nonzero Specht module whose invariant bilinear form is identically zero and whose form quotient is zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources