How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For monic of degrees splitting in a common extension,
Statement
Let be a field and let be monic of degrees . If in a common extension
then
If either degree is zero, both sides are the same empty product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Monic polynomials splitting in a common field extension as in the Statement.
For monic with roots , the resultant satisfies (For monic , and it vanishes exactly when and have a common root).
A split monic polynomial has the factorization with roots counted with multiplicity (Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials).
Proof
Evaluate the factorization in [L2] at each to get .
Substitute step 1.1 into [L1] and reassociate the finite product to obtain the double product.
If , [L1] is an empty outer product; if , every and the inner products are empty. In either case both sides equal .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, definition preceding Proposition 4.35 (standard reference, not scraped)