Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The neural-operator input and output spaces have the approximation property

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let D⊂Rd be a bounded Lipschitz domain. Each of the real spaces Lp(D) for 1≤p<∞, Wm,p(D) for m∈N and 1≤p<∞, and Cm(Dˉ) for m∈N0 has the approximation property: on every norm-compact subset, the identity can be approximated uniformly by bounded finite-rank linear maps. Here the Cm norm is the maximum of the uniform norms of the derivatives through order m, extended continuously to Dˉ. For any bounded Lipschitz domain D′⊂Rd′, the corresponding real output spaces Lp2(D′) for 1≤p2<∞, Wm2,p2(D′) for m2∈N and 1≤p2<∞, and Cm2(D′‾) for m2∈N0 also have the approximation property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded Lipschitz domain and one of the listed real function spaces.

[F1]

For every listed space, every norm-compact set and every positive error, a bounded finite-rank map with that compact-uniform error exists, with range consisting of restrictions of compactly supported ambient smooth functions (Inward mollification and smooth finite-rank approximation on Lipschitz domains).

[F2]

AP for a Banach space means uniform approximation of the identity on each norm-compact subset by bounded finite-rank linear maps (Approximation property and bounded approximation property).

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, the integer-order Sobolev formula is a norm and W0,p=Lp, and real Lp is complete (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The Sobolev norm descends to equivalence classes, Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞).

[F4]

Hölder bounds the integral pairing by the product of conjugate norms, including conjugate exponents 1 and ∞ (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F5]

For a continuously differentiable real curve on a compact interval, the integral of its derivative is its endpoint difference; a continuous integrand has its integral as a differentiable primitive (Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves).

Choice use: Countable Choice supplies the Lp completeness and weak-derivative interfaces in [F3], the calculus interface [F5], and the inward-mollification lemma [F1]. The final passage to AP makes no additional selections from infinite families.

Proof

1.1F3F4givenconstruct

The listed Sobolev spaces are Banach under the stated Countable Choice hypothesis. Indeed, let (un) be Cauchy in Wm,p(D). By [F3], for each of the finitely many ∣α∣≤m, Dαun converges in Lp to a class vα; put u=v0. For any ϕ∈Cc∞(D), its derivatives are bounded with compact support, hence belong to the conjugate Lp′ space, including p′=∞ when p=1. By [F4], both integrals in ∫DunDαϕ=(−1)∣α∣∫DDαunϕ converge to the corresponding integrals of u and vα. Thus vα is the weak derivative Dαu by [F3], so u∈Wm,p(D), and the finite norm sum gives un→u in that norm. This includes m=0, which gives Lp(D).

1.2F5givenconstructalgebra

The listed Cm(Dˉ) spaces are Banach as well. If (un) is Cauchy in their norm, every derivative sequence has a uniform limit gα on Dˉ: pointwise real completeness gives the limit, and the uniform Cauchy estimate gives uniform convergence. Each gα is continuous, since for a positive error one first approximates it uniformly by a fixed continuous Dαun and then applies continuity of that fixed function. Put u=g0. For ∣α∣<m, an interior point x, and a coordinate direction ei, take h small enough that the segment x+[0,h]ei lies in D. By [F5], Dαun(x+hei)−Dαun(x)=∫0hDα+eiun(x+sei) ds. Uniform convergence passes this identity to gα(x+hei)−gα(x)=∫0hgα+ei(x+sei) ds, since the integral error is bounded by ∣h∣ times the uniform error. By [F5], ∂igα=gα+ei. Induction in ∣α∣ yields Dαu=gα in D through order m, with the continuous extensions already supplied on Dˉ. Thus u∈Cm(Dˉ) and un→u in norm. For m=0 only the uniform-limit continuity argument is needed. The displayed maximum is a norm because its order-zero term detects zero functions and the remaining norm axioms hold termwise.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2given

Fix one listed space X, a norm-compact K⊆X, and ε>0. Its Banach-space status was established in the two preceding steps. Apply [F1], using W0,p=Lp in the Lebesgue case, to obtain a bounded finite-rank F:X→X with sup⁡u∈K∥Fu−u∥X<ε. These are exactly the quantified requirements of [F2], so every listed space has AP, including every p=1 case.

3.1step 2.1given∎

The argument in step 2.1 holds for every Euclidean dimension, every nonnegative integer regularity and every finite exponent in the stated ranges. Applying it with the output dimension and output regularity parameters proves the output-space clause. The proof establishes AP for Cm(Dˉ) without any basis assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources