Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Number field places classification

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Places of a number field K mean equivalence classes of nontrivial absolute values. They consist of real embeddings, conjugate pairs of nonreal complex embeddings, and one nonarchimedean place for each nonzero prime P of OK. A finite representative is xP=(NP)ordPx. If P lies above a rational prime p, this restricts on Q to pef, with e=ordP(p) and NP=pf.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a number field K, with places defined as in the statement.

[F1]

Completion of an absolutely valued field: The metric completion F^ of an absolutely valued field F has a unique compatible complete valued-field structure. The map FF^ is a dense isometric field embedding, universal for isometric field maps from F to complete valued fields. In the nonarchimedean case the value group and residue field are unchanged. We use the ordinary metric-completion construction with its countable-choice assumption for arbitrary metric spaces.

[F2]

Finite dimensional norm equivalence over a complete valued field: Let F be complete for a multiplicative absolute value and V a finite-dimensional normed F-vector space. For any basis v1,,vn, its coordinate sup norm aivi=maxiai is bounded above and below by positive multiples of the given norm. For n=0 both norms are zero. Consequently V is complete and every linear subspace is closed.

[F3]

Uniqueness of an extended complete field absolute value: For a finite extension E/F of a complete absolutely valued field F, at most one absolute value on E extends the given absolute value on F. Any such extension makes E complete.

[F4]

Ostrowski's theorem for the rationals: Let be a nontrivial absolute value on Q in the sense of def-multiplicative-absolute-value-on-a-field. Then exactly one of the following holds. 1. is equivalent to the usual absolute value on Q. 2. There is a unique prime p such that is equivalent to p of def-p-adic-absolute-value-on-the-rationals.

[F5]

Two nontrivial absolute values induce the same topology exactly when one is a positive power of the other: Let F be a field, and let 1 and 2 be nontrivial absolute values on F. Then they induce the same topology on F if and only if they are equivalent in the sense of def-equivalent-field-absolute-values.

[F6]

Localizing a Dedekind domain at a nonzero prime gives a DVR: Let R be a Dedekind domain and let pR be a nonzero prime ideal. Then Rp is a discrete valuation ring.

[F7]

Fundamental theorem of algebra by Liouville's theorem: Every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root. This proof uses Liouville's theorem and is independent of the minimum-modulus proof cited in the accompanying agreement remark.

[F8]

Ring of integers: For a number field K, its ring of integers is OK, the integral closure of Z in K. It is not an arbitrary order.

[F9]

The norm of a prime ideal: For a nonzero prime POK, there is a rational prime p and an integer f1 with PZ=(p) and NP=pf.

[F10]

Rings of integers are Dedekind domains: Assuming Choice, the ring of integers of every number field is a Dedekind domain.

Proof

1.1

A nontrivial absolute value on K cannot restrict trivially to the rationals. If it did, for each algebraic x and all n, reduction by its fixed minimal equation would express xn in a fixed finite list of powers of x with rational coefficients of value at most one. Thus xn is bounded independently of n and x1. Apply the same argument to x1 to obtain x=1 for nonzero x. Ostrowski and the equivalence characterization therefore leave precisely a p-adic restriction up to positive power, or the usual archimedean restriction up to positive power.

F4F5
2.1

If the restriction is a positive power of the p-adic value, then all integers have value at most one. The binomial theorem gives x+yn(n+1)max(x,y)n; taking nth roots and letting n proves the ultrametric inequality on K. For this nonarchimedean value, every algebraic integer has value at most one: otherwise its leading term in a monic integral equation would have strictly greater value than the sum of the others. Then P={aOK:a<1} is a proper prime ideal, and it is nonzero since it contains the rational prime p. By [F10], OK is Dedekind, so [F6] applies and (OK)P is a DVR. Elements outside P have value one; every nonzero element of K is uϖm with u a local unit, so its value is ϖm, 0<ϖ<1. Hence its place is exactly P's valuation place. The elements of OK with value less than one recover P, proving uniqueness. Conversely a DVR valuation defines that nontrivial absolute-value place.

F6F8F10step 1.1
2.2

In the archimedean case write the restriction as the ordinary value to a power 0<a1; a>1 is excluded by the triangle inequality on positive integers. The completion contains the complete real field with this powered value. The image V of RQK in the completion is a finite-dimensional normed real vector space over that valued real field. It is complete, hence closed, and contains the dense K, so equals the completion. V is a finite-dimensional real domain and thus a field (multiplication by any nonzero element is injective and hence surjective). By the fundamental theorem of algebra, real irreducible polynomials have degree at most two: after adjoining one nonreal element one gets C, which has no proper finite algebraic extensions. Therefore V is R or C. Uniqueness of extending values identifies its value with the ordinary modulus to the a-th power.

F1F2F3F7step 1.1
3.1

Each embedding into the reals or complexes gives such a place. If two embeddings give equivalent places, normalize their restriction to the same real power. The equivalence exponent must then be one on the rationals; their completions are isometrically isomorphic fixing the dense K and hence the reals. A real automorphism of the complexes sends i to i or -i, so these embeddings are equal or conjugate. Conversely conjugation preserves modulus. Finally NP=pf and ordP(x)=eordp(x) for rational x (rational units at p are local units) give the stated exponent ef.

F9step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources