How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discrete Poincaré inequality from boundary paths
Statement
Let be a finite boundary-anchored TPFA mesh and let be its interior and boundary transmissibilities. A boundary path family assigns to each cell a finite simple path of adjacent interior faces, followed by one boundary face of its terminal cell; simple means it visits no cell more than once. Set on an interior face with a fixed orientation, and set on a boundary face of . The sign of an interior increment is reversed when the path traverses the fixed orientation backward. Put Then every cell vector satisfies the discrete Poincaré inequality Consequently, any uniformly regular mesh family supplied with boundary path families whose are uniformly bounded has a mesh-uniform Poincaré constant. This theorem does not assert that every orthogonal mesh family has such a uniform path bound.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite cell-face mesh, positive interior and boundary transmissibilities, a specified boundary path from every cell, and the finite value above.
Finite-volume cell-face meshes and geometric regularity: each cell has a finite boundary path in a boundary-anchored mesh, and is its volume.
Orthogonal TPFA diffusion with harmonic face transmissibility: the transmissibility energy is , with boundary increment because the Dirichlet boundary value is zero.
For each cell , a particular finite path is included as data; and are finite.
Proof
Fix a cell . Traverse its supplied path to a boundary face. The signed increments telescope from to the terminal boundary value , so , where each records the orientation.
Weighted Cauchy–Schwarz with weights gives .
Multiply step 2.1 by and sum over all cells. Since the mesh, edge set, and paths are finite, reorder the sums to obtain The last sum is the energy norm in [F2], proving the assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Eymard, T. Gallouët, and R. Herbin, Finite Volume Methods, Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Vol. VII, 2000; complete updated author text (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jérôme Droniou, Finite volume schemes for diffusion equations: introduction to and review of modern methods, 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)