How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuous path-independent field has a potential constructed by line integrals
Statement
Let be nonempty, open, and piecewise- path-connected. If the continuous field is path-independent, then it is conservative. More precisely, for any basepoint ,
is well-defined, is , satisfies , and has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The domain, field, path independence, and basepoint in the Statement.
Piecewise- path-connectedness supplies a path in from to each , and path independence makes the integral depend only on its endpoints (Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence).
Vector line integrals add under concatenation, and a constant path has integral zero (Line integrals under reversal and concatenation, Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).
If all partial derivatives exist near a point and are continuous there, then the function is totally differentiable there, with derivative matrix equal to its Jacobian (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
An orientation-preserving oriented piecewise- reparametrization leaves a vector line integral unchanged (Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses).
Proof
By [L1], the displayed formula defines one real number for every . Choosing the constant path at and using [L2] gives .
Fix and a coordinate . Since is open, there is such that whenever . Take any path from to and reparametrize it by the increasing affine bijection of onto its domain; this is an orientation-preserving oriented reparametrization, so [L4] leaves its integral unchanged. Both it and the coordinate segment , , now have domain , so the concatenation in [L2] is defined; append .
Path independence and [L2] give, for ,
Divide step 2.1 by . For every , continuity of at makes uniformly for when is sufficiently small. Therefore the quotient tends to , so .
Since and were arbitrary, all partial derivatives of are the continuous components of . By [L3], is totally differentiable everywhere with , and these derivatives vary continuously; hence is .
Thus is the normalized potential asserted in the Statement, and is conservative.
Depends on
- Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence
- Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals
- Line integrals under reversal and concatenation
- If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative
- Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 94 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Theorem 9.3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)