How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Path independence is equivalent to zero integral around every closed piecewise-C1 path
Statement
Let be open and piecewise- path-connected, and let be continuous. The following are equivalent:
- is path-independent;
- every closed piecewise- path in satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The domain and field in the Statement.
Path independence means equality of vector line integrals along any two piecewise- paths with the same endpoints (Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence).
Under concatenation vector line integrals add, and reversal negates a vector line integral (Line integrals under reversal and concatenation).
A constant path has zero vector line integral because its velocity is zero (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).
An orientation-preserving oriented piecewise- reparametrization leaves a vector line integral unchanged (Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses).
Proof
Assume condition 1, and let be closed at . The path and the constant path at have the same endpoints, so [L1] and [L3] give . Thus condition 2 holds.
Conversely, assume condition 2. Let and be paths from to . The increasing affine bijection of onto a path's domain is an orientation-preserving oriented reparametrization, so by [L4] we may replace each path by its reparametrization on without changing either integral. With both domains , the concatenation in [L2] is defined and is closed.
By condition 2 and [L2],
Hence the two integrals agree, and [L1] gives path independence.
Step 1.1 proves the forward direction, and steps 1.2, 2.1, and 3.1 prove the reverse direction. Piecewise- path-connectedness guarantees that the comparison paths relevant to condition 1 exist between any two points of .
Depends on
- Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence
- Line integrals under reversal and concatenation
- Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals
- Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 66 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Theorem 9.3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)