Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Periodic PIC particle and force errors under a prescribed initial coupling

Statement

Fix ε>0 and grid width h. Let Kε and Kε,h be the phase kernels of Fixed-regularization periodic PIC pair kernel, and let Lε be the two-variable global Lipschitz constant of Fixed-regularization periodic PIC kernels are globally Lipschitz. Suppose a probability characteristic solution μt for Kε and an equal-weight finite-particle grid solution with empirical law νth are defined on [0,T], with finite first moments and integrable path suprema. Assume the uniform grid-force defect δε,h=sup⁡z,z′∈R2d∣Kε,h(z,z′)−Kε(z,z′)∣<∞. If δ0=W1(ν0h,μ0) is the actual initial empirical-measure error, then for every 0≤t≤T, W1(νth,μt)≤e2Lεt(δ0+tδε,h). No rate for δ0 is implied: in particular, no dimension-free P−1/2 Wasserstein rate is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed regularization and grid, a finite equal-weight particle path, a continuum characteristic solution, finite first moments, a prescribed initial coupling, and the uniform pair-kernel force defect.

[F1]

Fixed-regularization periodic PIC pair kernel: the equal-weight particle system is z˙i=P−1∑jKε,h(zi,zj) and the continuum kernel is Kε.

[F2]

Fixed-regularization periodic PIC kernels are globally Lipschitz: Kε,h and Kε have two-variable Lipschitz constants Lε,h and Lε, respectively, in the stated sum convention.

[F3]

The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein distance: W1 is the infimum of ∫∣z−z′∣ dπ over Borel probability couplings of finite-first-moment laws; no minimizing coupling is part of the definition.

[F4]

Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation: a characteristic solution is the pushforward of its initial probability by an absolutely continuous label flow satisfying its integral equation.

[F5]

Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if u(t)≤b∫0tu(s) ds for a nonnegative continuous u and b≥0, then u(t)=0.

[F6]

Probability W1 stability under bounded force defects: for two characteristic flows of the same kernel with defects bounded by ημ,ην, every initial coupling of cost D0 gives transported cost at most e2Lεt(D0+(ημ+ην)t).

Proof

1.1F1F2F5givenalgebra

If particles i and j start at the same phase state, subtract their grid equations. The terms with common second argument satisfy ∣zi(t)−zj(t)∣≤Lε,h∫0t∣zi(s)−zj(s)∣ ds, because the two-variable Lipschitz bound in [F2] applies with only the first argument changed. By [F5], the two paths agree. Thus the finite particle flow defines a single path Xt(a) for each distinct atom a of ν0h, independent of the label representing a.

2.1F1F2F4givenstep 1.1algebra

Extend Xt by the identity off the finite support of ν0h. This is a jointly Borel map, its paths are absolutely continuous on that support, and their path suprema are integrable because the support is finite and each path is continuous on [0,T]. Also νth=(Xt)#ν0h. For a support point a, the finite system equation can be written as rh(t,a)=∫(Kε,h(Xt(a),Xt(b))−Kε(Xt(a),Xt(b)))dν0h(b). Thus X˙t(a)=∫Kε(Xt(a),Xt(b))dν0h(b)+rh(t,a). This measurable residual has norm at most δε,h by the uniform defect hypothesis. The continuum characteristic flow has residual zero.

3.1F2F3F4F6step 1.1step 2.1

Fix any prescribed initial coupling π0 of ν0h and μ0 with cost D0. Apply [F6] to the two characteristic flows in steps 1.1 and 2.1, with ημ=0 and ην=δε,h. The transported coupling has cost at most e2Lεt(D0+tδε,h), so by [F3] the same expression bounds W1(νth,μt).

4.1F3step 3.1∎

Step 3.1 holds for every initial coupling. Taking the infimum over its initial cost D0 gives δ0 by [F3], yielding the claimed inequality. No coupling attaining the infimum is selected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources