How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A positive tangent Hessian gives a strict local projector minimum
Statement
Let be stationary for the energy of Finite-basis projector energy model. Use its graph chart from Graph charts and tangent directions for complex rank-r projectors, with , and put . If there is such that then is a strict isolated local minimum on . Since projectors identify frames related by unitary rotations, this is a strict local minimum modulo orbital gauge. This is a sufficient condition, not a claim that every stationary point satisfies it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A energy on , a stationary projector , its graph chart, and a positive lower bound for the chart Hessian.
Stationarity on is the vanishing of the derivative on every tangent direction (Projector-energy stationarity is equivalent to Fock commutation).
The graph map is a smooth one-to-one coordinate chart near ; frames differing by a unitary represent the same projector (Graph charts and tangent directions for complex rank-r projectors).
The fundamental theorem of calculus differentiates an integral of a continuous function (The first fundamental theorem: if is integrable on and continuous at , then ; in particular a continuous has as a primitive); applying it twice gives the second-order integral remainder used below.
Proof
The derivative of at is . The chart differential is tangent by [F2], so stationarity [F1] makes this derivative zero for every .
By the assumed Hessian bound and continuity of , there is a neighborhood of in which for every . For in this neighborhood, the one-variable fundamental theorem of calculus [F3] applied twice to gives . By step 1.1 this is positive for every nonzero .
The graph chart is one-to-one and maps an open neighborhood of onto a neighborhood of in projector space by [F2]. Step 2.1 therefore proves that every distinct nearby projector has strictly larger energy. Projectors represent unitary-equivalence classes of occupied frames, so the same statement is strict local minimality modulo orbital gauge.
Depends on
- Finite-basis projector energy model
- The finite projector energy is real and has the stated Frobenius gradient
- Graph charts and tangent directions for complex rank-r projectors
- Projector-energy stationarity is equivalent to Fock commutation
- The first fundamental theorem: if $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ and continuous at $c$, then $F'(c) = f(c)$; in particular a continuous $f$ has $F$ as a primitive
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alan Edelman, Tomás A. Arias, and Steven T. Smith, The Geometry of Algorithms with Orthogonality Constraints, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 20 (1998), §2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P.-A. Absil, R. Mahony, and R. Sepulchre, Optimization Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds, Chapter 3, Princeton University Press (2008), §§3.4.4 and 3.5.7 (standard reference, not scraped)