How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-basis projector energy model
Definition
Let be an finite-basis overlap matrix and supply its Cholesky factor with , invertible (Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal, A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique). If is the coefficient-basis one-body matrix, set , where ; this is the Cholesky whitening whose generalized Ritz quotient is preserved by Positive-definite overlap whitening preserves a generalized Ritz pencil. For coefficient vectors use ; the interaction map and chosen exchange-correlation functional below are supplied in these orthonormal coordinates. Fix and the projector domain of Rank-r orthogonal projector domain.
With the whitened Hermitian matrix fixed above, supply a real-linear self-adjoint map for the Frobenius inner product, and a real-valued functional on an open neighborhood of . Define Here is the Hermitian Frobenius-gradient formula justified by The finite projector energy is real and has the stated Frobenius gradient ↗.
The finite-basis Hartree–Fock model is the special case with a supplied symmetry-compatible Coulomb/exchange tensor defining . A Kohn–Sham-like model supplies its density map and chosen differentiable exchange-correlation functional. These are finite-dimensional mathematical models; this definition makes no assertion that the selected functional is an exact continuum physical energy.
Depends on
- Rank-r orthogonal projector domain
- Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal
- A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique
- Positive-definite overlap whitening preserves a generalized Ritz pencil
- Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix $I_n$, including zero-sized shapes
- The trace $\operatorname{tr}(A)$ as the sum of the diagonal entries
- The real Frechet derivative on real and complex matrix spaces with the Frobenius norm
Used by
- The finite-basis projector energy model supplies a C1 Hermitian response map Corollary
- A cusp in a chosen exchange-correlation term violates the C2 hypothesis Example
- A finite-basis occupied projector map can two-cycle despite a uniform gap Example
- A reported singular DIIS Gram system triggers the baseline fallback Example
- A two-level nonlinear projector model has a stationary strict maximum Example
- An ill-conditioned overlap preserves exact Ritz values but amplifies coordinate errors Example
- Complex finite-basis PC-VAR optimization on Grassmann Example
- The finite projector energy is real and has the stated Frobenius gradient Proposition
- A finite-basis projector energy attains a global minimum Theorem
- A positive tangent Hessian gives a strict local projector minimum Theorem
- Projector-energy stationarity is equivalent to Fock commutation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eric Cancès and Claude Le Bris, On the convergence of SCF algorithms for the Hartree-Fock equations, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 34 (2000), §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alan Edelman, Tomás A. Arias, and Steven T. Smith, The Geometry of Algorithms with Orthogonality Constraints, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 20 (1998), §§2.3–2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)