Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive-definite overlap whitening preserves a generalized Ritz pencil

Statement

Let H=H∗∈Mn(C) be a finite Hermitian stiffness matrix and let S=S∗>0 be a positive-definite overlap or mass matrix. By Cholesky factorization (A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique), write S=LL∗ with L invertible lower triangular and positive diagonal. Define the whitened Hermitian matrix H~:=L−1HL−∗,L−∗:=(L∗)−1. The generalized Ritz equation Hc=λSc is equivalent under the invertible change of coordinates y=L∗c to H~y=λy. The Rayleigh quotients agree: c∗Hcc∗Sc=y∗H~yy∗y(c≠0).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Hermitian matrix H, a Hermitian positive-definite matrix S, its Cholesky factor L, and a nonzero coefficient vector c.

[F1]

A Hermitian positive-definite matrix has a unique Cholesky factorization S=LL∗ with L lower triangular and positive real diagonal; such L is invertible (Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal, A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique).

[F2]

Matrix products and identity matrices use the entrywise convention of Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes.

[F3]

For compatible finite-dimensional maps, (AB)∗=B∗A∗, A∗∗=A, and I∗=I (Adjoints satisfy (S+T)∗=S∗+T∗, (λT)∗=λ‾T∗, (ST)∗=T∗S∗, and T∗∗=T). In the standard orthonormal coordinate bases these adjoints are the conjugate-transpose matrices (In orthonormal bases, the matrix of the adjoint is the conjugate transpose of the matrix).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: H=H∗, S=LL∗, L invertible, c≠0, and y=L∗c.

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Taking adjoints of L−1L=I and LL−1=I by [F3] gives L∗(L−1)∗=I and (L−1)∗L∗=I. Hence L∗ is invertible with inverse (L−1)∗=L−∗; taking adjoints again gives (L−∗)∗=L−1. The matrix H~=L−1HL−∗ is Hermitian, since H~∗=(L−∗)∗H∗(L−1)∗=L−1HL−∗=H~. The coordinate map c↦y=L∗c is invertible by [F1].

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Substituting c=L−∗y into Hc=λSc and multiplying by L−1 gives L−1HL−∗y=λL−1LL∗L−∗y=λy. Every operation is reversible because L is invertible, so the generalized and whitened eigenproblems have exactly the same eigenvalues, with eigenvectors related by y=L∗c.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

With c=L−∗y, matrix multiplication gives c∗Hc=y∗L−1HL−∗y=y∗H~y,c∗Sc=y∗L−1LL∗L−∗y=y∗y. Since c≠0 iff y≠0, and S>0 makes c∗Sc>0, both equal denominators are positive. Division proves equality of the two Rayleigh quotients.

Remarks

The equivalence is exact linear algebra. It does not by itself assert a continuum eigenvalue bound: that requires the finite basis to be a conforming subspace of the stated form domain and the matrices to be the corresponding form and inner-product matrices.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources