Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Hermitian Ritz residual certifies spectral proximity and a gap-conditioned direction

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let A be a Hermitian operator on a nonzero finite-dimensional real or complex Hilbert space. Let u be a unit vector, μ:=(Au,u) its Rayleigh quotient, and ρ:=∥(A−μI)u∥. Let Σ(A) be the finite set of eigenvalues of A and, for a nonempty finite set S⊆R, define dist⁡(x,S):=min⁡ν∈S∣x−ν∣. Then dist⁡(μ,Σ(A))≤ρ. If a specified target eigenvalue λ∈Σ(A) is simple, let e be any unit eigenvector for it. If Σ(A)∖{λ} is nonempty, assume the certified separation Δ:=min⁡ν∈Σ(A)∖{λ}∣μ−ν∣>0. Then the phase-invariant angle satisfies sin⁡∠(u,e):=1−∣(u,e)∣2≤ρ/Δ. If the target is the only eigenvalue, simplicity implies the Hilbert space is one-dimensional and the angle is zero. The residual alone does not identify which eigenvalue is nearby, in particular it does not certify that the target is the lowest eigenvalue.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, a Hermitian operator A, a unit vector u, its real Rayleigh quotient μ, and the residual norm ρ.

[F1]

A compact self-adjoint operator has real eigenvalues and an orthogonal spectral expansion; in finite dimension its eigenspaces span the whole space (Spectral theorem for compact self adjoint operators, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

The inner product is linear in its first argument, conjugate-linear in its second, and positive definite (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length, Hilbert space).

[F3]

A finite-dimensional inner product space has an orthonormal basis; in finite-dimensional coordinates closed bounded sets are compact; and the closed-unit-ball criterion characterizes compact operators (Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis, Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, Compact linear operator).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, the finite-dimensional Hilbert space, A,u,μ,ρ as in the statement, and the inner-product convention in [F2].

1.1F3givenalgebra

Choose an orthonormal basis f1,…,fN by [F3]. For x=∑jcjfj with ∥x∥≤1, orthonormality gives ∣cj∣≤1, so the triangle inequality yields ∥Ax∥≤∑j∥Afj∥. Thus A maps the closed unit ball to a bounded set. Its closure is closed and bounded in finite-dimensional coordinates, hence compact by [F3]. The compact-operator unit-ball criterion in [F3] makes A compact; Hermitian symmetry makes it self-adjoint.

2.1F1F2step 1.1given

Apply [F1] to the compact self-adjoint operator from step 1.1 to obtain an orthonormal eigenbasis (ej)j=1N with real eigenvalues λj. Expand u=∑j=1Ncjej, where cj=(u,ej) and ∑j∣cj∣2=∥u∥2=1 by [F2]. Hence μ=∑jλj∣cj∣2∈R.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Orthogonality gives ρ2=∥(A−μI)u∥2=∑j=1N∣λj−μ∣2∣cj∣2≥dist⁡(μ,Σ(A))2∑j∣cj∣2. Since the coefficient squares sum to one by step 2.1, taking nonnegative square roots proves the spectral-proximity bound.

4.1F1step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra

If there is no eigenvalue other than the simple target, then N=1 and u is a unit multiple of e, so the angle is zero. Otherwise choose the indexing so ek=e and λk=λ. The phase-invariant angle obeys sin⁡2∠(u,e)=1−∣ck∣2=∑j≠k∣cj∣2. For each j≠k, ∣λj−μ∣≥Δ by definition. Therefore ρ2=∑j∣λj−μ∣2∣cj∣2≥Δ2∑j≠k∣cj∣2=Δ2sin⁡2∠(u,e). Taking square roots proves the directional estimate; if the target is the only eigenvalue, simplicity gives the zero-angle branch already handled.

5.1step 3.1given∎

The proximity estimate minimizes over the entire spectrum and contains no ordering or target label. It only says that some eigenvalue lies within ρ of μ; without an additional spectral-location certificate it does not identify that eigenvalue as the lowest one.

Remarks

This is a finite-dimensional Hermitian statement. For an unbounded compact-resolvent form operator, a residual must be defined in the correct operator or form-dual norm and requires its own domain and regularity proof; the finite-matrix formula is not transferred to that setting here. Repeated eigenvalues are compared as invariant subspaces using A residual and a spectral separation bound an invariant-subspace gap, not by choosing a canonical eigenvector.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources