How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nearly dependent finite basis has an ill-conditioned overlap matrix
Example
For , take the two unit vectors in . Their overlap (Gram) matrix is With the stiffness matrix , the generalized Ritz eigenvalues are and . The basis vectors approach one another as , while the overlap condition number is . Cholesky whitening changes coordinates but preserves those generalized eigenvalues exactly.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the vectors , the Gram matrix , and .
Matrix products, conjugate transpose, identity matrices and the overlap matrix convention are as in Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes.
A Hermitian positive-definite matrix has a unique Cholesky factor with positive diagonal (Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal, A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique).
Cholesky whitening preserves the eigenvalues and Rayleigh quotients of the generalized Hermitian pencil (Positive-definite overlap whitening preserves a generalized Ritz pencil).
Proof
Given: The two basis vectors and matrices in the example.
Both vectors have norm one and , so their Gram matrix is the displayed . Its eigenvectors and have eigenvalues and , both positive. Thus is positive definite and its spectral condition number is . Also , which tends to zero.
For , diagonalizing in the same two eigenvectors shows that has eigenvalues and . The Cholesky factor is so and its positive diagonal makes it the factor in [F2]. By [F3], the whitened Hermitian problem has the same two eigenvalues. For example, at with integer , the condition number is , which grows without bound although whitening is an exact change of coordinates.
Remarks
This calculation concerns exact arithmetic. Whitening removes the overlap matrix from the generalized pencil; it does not make the original basis well-conditioned or provide a finite-precision stability bound.
Depends on
- Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal
- Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix $I_n$, including zero-sized shapes
- Positive-definite overlap whitening preserves a generalized Ritz pencil
- A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Finite Element Methods, Fall 2025, Chapter 47 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bertrand Mercier, Topics in Finite Element Solution of Elliptic Problems, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)