Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A broken piecewise-constant trial space can give an eigenvalue below the Dirichlet ground state

Example

Let Ω=(0,1)2 and divide it into two closed triangles by the diagonal from (0,0) to (1,1). Let w equal 1 on one triangle and 0 on the other. Take degree k=0 and scalar values q=1, so w is a nonzero member of the broken piecewise-constant space. For the broken stiffness form abr(u,v):=∑K∈T∫K∇u⋅∇v‾ dx and mass form b(u,v):=∫Ωuv‾ dx, w is a Ritz eigenvector with eigenvalue 0. The continuous Dirichlet ground-state value λ1 is positive, so this nonconforming value lies strictly below it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice; the square Ω; its two-triangle matching mesh; the scalar, degree-zero broken space; and w as defined above.

[F1]

The broken polynomial space consists of cellwise polynomials with no continuity constraint across interior facets; for degree zero it includes the cellwise constants (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh).

[F2]

The Dirichlet Laplacian on a nonempty bounded open set has a first eigenvalue λ1>0 under the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Poincare constant is the reciprocal square root of the first Dirichlet eigenvalue).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The two cells K1,K2, the broken function w, and the forms abr and b.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Each triangle has area 1/2, so b(w,w)=∫K11 dx=1/2>0. The cellwise gradient of each constant restriction is zero. Hence abr(w,v)=0 for every broken piecewise-constant v, and in particular abr(w,v)=0 b(w,v) for all such v. This is the generalized Ritz equation with eigenvalue zero.

2.1F1F2given∎

The square is nonempty, open and bounded, so [F2] gives λ1>0. Therefore the broken Ritz eigenvalue 0 is strictly less than λ1. The usual conforming min–max conclusion does not apply to this trial space: the two traces of w across the diagonal differ, so w is outside the conforming subspace in [F1]. Moreover, the broken stiffness form is only a seminorm on this piecewise-constant space.

Remarks

The example identifies why conformity and coercivity are hypotheses of the upper-bound theorem. It does not say that every nonconforming discretization underestimates the ground state.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources