How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A broken piecewise-constant trial space can give an eigenvalue below the Dirichlet ground state
Example
Let and divide it into two closed triangles by the diagonal from to . Let equal on one triangle and on the other. Take degree and scalar values , so is a nonzero member of the broken piecewise-constant space. For the broken stiffness form and mass form , is a Ritz eigenvector with eigenvalue . The continuous Dirichlet ground-state value is positive, so this nonconforming value lies strictly below it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice; the square ; its two-triangle matching mesh; the scalar, degree-zero broken space; and as defined above.
The broken polynomial space consists of cellwise polynomials with no continuity constraint across interior facets; for degree zero it includes the cellwise constants (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh).
The Dirichlet Laplacian on a nonempty bounded open set has a first eigenvalue under the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Poincare constant is the reciprocal square root of the first Dirichlet eigenvalue).
Proof
Given: The two cells , the broken function , and the forms and .
Each triangle has area , so . The cellwise gradient of each constant restriction is zero. Hence for every broken piecewise-constant , and in particular for all such . This is the generalized Ritz equation with eigenvalue zero.
The square is nonempty, open and bounded, so [F2] gives . Therefore the broken Ritz eigenvalue is strictly less than . The usual conforming min–max conclusion does not apply to this trial space: the two traces of across the diagonal differ, so is outside the conforming subspace in [F1]. Moreover, the broken stiffness form is only a seminorm on this piecewise-constant space.
Remarks
The example identifies why conformity and coercivity are hypotheses of the upper-bound theorem. It does not say that every nonconforming discretization underestimates the ground state.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Finite Element Methods, Fall 2025, Chapter 47 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bertrand Mercier, Topics in Finite Element Solution of Elliptic Problems, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)