Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If a diagonalisable matrix has a simple eigenvalue of strictly largest modulus and the start vector has a nonzero component in that eigendirection, power iteration converges projectively at the eigenvalue-ratio rate

Statement

Let F{R,C}, let n2, and let AMn(F) be diagonalisable with eigenvalues λ1,,λn and eigenvectors v1,,vn, where λ1>λ2λn and λ1 is simple. Let x0=i=1ncivi with c10, and let (xk) be the power iteration of Power iteration with normalisation and Rayleigh-quotient eigenvalue estimates. Then there exist scalars αkF with αk=1 such that

αkxkv1v122=O ⁣(λ2λ1k).

In particular, xk converges to the eigendirection of λ1 projectively.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A diagonalisable matrix A with the displayed eigenvalue ordering, and a start vector x0=icivi with c10.

[L2]

Power iteration is the normalised recurrence xk+1=Axk/Axk2 (Power iteration with normalisation and Rayleigh-quotient eigenvalue estimates).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the chosen eigenvectors form a basis, so for every k0, Akx0=λ1k(c1v1+i=2nci(λiλ1)kvi).

L1givenalgebra
1.2

The strict modulus inequality and n2 imply λ10. In the eigenbasis, the v1-coefficient of Akx0 is c1λ1k0, so Akx00 for every k0. Therefore the iteration of [L2] is defined at every step and has the same direction as Akx0. Moreover, because λi/λ1<1 for i2, the bracket in step 1.1 tends to c1v1.

L2step 1.1algebra
2.1

Let αk cancel the phase of λ1kc1. Then step 1.1 gives αkxk=v1+i=2n(ci/c1)(λi/λ1)kviv1+i=2n(ci/c1)(λi/λ1)kvi2. The numerator differs from v1 by O(λ2/λ1k), so the same is true after normalisation.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
3.1

Therefore the normalised iterates converge projectively to the eigendirection of v1, and the convergence rate is O(λ2/λ1k).

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources