Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

PP is strict sign testing for Gap-P

Statement

A language L lies in PP if and only if there is a g∈GapP such that x∈L  ⟺  g(x)>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the PP and GapP conventions.

[L1]

A GapP value is the difference between accepting and rejecting path counts, by Sharp-P and Gap-P functions.

[L2]

PP uses a strict acceptance-probability threshold of 1/2, by The classes RP, coRP, ZPP, BPP, and PP.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2given

Let a PP machine use exactly p(∣x∣) random bits, padding unused bits if necessary, and let a(x) and r(x) be its accepting and rejecting choice-string counts. Then g=a−r is in GapP by [L1], and g(x)>0 exactly when a(x)>2p(∣x∣)−1, the strict PP condition in [L2].

1.2L1L2givenconstruct

Conversely take a GapP machine for g, let f count its accepting paths, and let h count its rejecting paths (the latter is a #P count after exchanging final labels), so g=f−h. Choose a common polynomial bound p(∣x∣) on the number of binary choices. Encode each original path by its actual choice bits followed by only zeroes to length p; reject a nonzero unused suffix. This gives exactly one full-length encoding per original path and does not multiply either count when a branch halts early. Each normalized machine has 2p total full-length paths. Construct a machine with one leading choice: on branch 0 run the machine for f with its labels unchanged; on branch 1 run the machine for h with accept and reject exchanged. It has f(x)+(2p−h(x)) accepting paths out of 2p+1, a strict majority exactly when f(x)−h(x)>0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the two implications, including the strict zero boundary.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources