How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The classes RP, coRP, ZPP, BPP, and PP
Definition
Let be a language. Each bounded-error class below is defined by the existence of a probabilistic polynomial-time machine satisfying the stated conditions on every input .
-
lies in RP when there exists such an for which:
- if , then rejects with probability ;
- if , then accepts with probability at least .
-
lies in coRP when there exists such an for which:
- if , then accepts with probability ;
- if , then rejects with probability at least .
-
lies in BPP when there exists such an for which:
- if , then accepts with probability at least ;
- if , then rejects with probability at least .
-
lies in PP when there exists such an for which:
- if , then accepts with probability strictly greater than ;
- if , then accepts with probability at most .
-
lies in ZPP when there is a probabilistic algorithm that always outputs the correct yes/no answer and whose expected runtime is polynomial in the input length.
Remarks
- The constants and are conventions; amplification later shows that the exact BPP error constant is inessential as long as it is bounded away from .
- The PP definition does not require any fixed gap above .
Depends on
Used by
- Polynomial identity testing is in coRP Corollary
- FALSE: every PP algorithm has bounded error separated from one half by a fixed constant False statement
- Adleman's theorem: BPP is contained in P/poly Theorem
- BPP amplification to exponentially small error Theorem
- BPP amplification to inverse-polynomial error Theorem
- PP is strict sign testing for Gap-P Theorem
- RP admits one-sided amplification to exponentially small error Theorem
- ZPP equals RP intersection coRP Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sanjeev Arora and Boaz Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eric Blais, Models of Computation, 14. Randomized Computation (standard reference, not scraped)