How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Prikry property
Statement
Let be a normal measure on , and let be Prikry forcing. For every and every forcing-language sentence , there is a direct extension which decides .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ZFC, in , and a fixed sentence (with any name parameters fixed). The stronger-below convention is in force.
Prikry forcing and its direct-extension order: Conditions with a fixed stem are compatible by intersecting their measure-one upper parts.
Finite-set homogeneity for a normal measure: A family of finite-set colourings into fewer than colours is simultaneously homogeneous on one measure-one set.
Monotonicity, density, and decision for forcing: Conditions deciding a fixed sentence are dense, forcing persists to stronger conditions, and a sentence forced densely below a condition is forced by that condition.
Proof
For each and , listed increasingly, colour by if some upper part makes a condition forcing , by if some such condition forces , and by if neither exists. Colours and cannot both apply: two witnesses have the same stem, so F1 gives a common extension, while persistence would make that extension force both alternatives. By F2, shrink to one on which every arity-colouring is constant, and set .
Decision density below gives a condition deciding . Let be the number of entries which the stem of adds after , and let be that increasing -tuple. Then and its colour is or , according to the decision made by ; it is not . Write for this homogeneous colour at arity .
For every , the homogeneous colour at arity is also . Indeed, start with a witness at having colour and choose further increasing points from its measure-one upper part intersected with ; strengthening by those points preserves its decision, so the resulting -tuple has colour . Homogeneity at that arity gives the claim, including . Only finite selection is made here; the arbitrary simultaneous measure-one choices occurred inside F2 and are the precise AC use propagated from The Axiom of Choice.
Let be arbitrary and let be the number of its new stem entries after . Extend that stem by points from its upper part. Its resulting -tuple has colour by step 3.1, so a same-stem witness forces the corresponding alternative. Intersecting the two upper parts as in F1 gives a common strengthening of which forces that alternative. Thus that alternative is dense below , and F3 implies that itself forces it. Hence decides without changing the stem of . [F1, F3, step 3.1]
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karagila, Forcing lecture notes, Section 9.2, Lemmas 9.11–9.12 (standard reference, not scraped)