Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Functional equation for primitive Dirichlet L-functions

Statement

For primitive χ modulo q of parity a, Λ(s,χ)=ε(χ)Λ(1s,χ),ε(χ)=(i)aτ(χ)/q. For q=1 this is the zeta functional equation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive character χ modulo q of parity a.

[F1]

The completion continues as stated (Analytic continuation of primitive Dirichlet L-functions).

[F2]

Its normalization is fixed in Completed primitive Dirichlet L-function.

[F3]

The Gaussian transform and twisted Poisson formula have the stated normalizations (Fourier transform of a Gaussian, Twisted Poisson summation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define, for t>0, θχ(t)=nZnaχ(n)eπn2t/q. For a=0, [F3] applied to xeπtx2/q gives θχ(t)=τ(χ)qt1/2θχ(1/t). For a=1, differentiating the Gaussian transform gives xeπtx2/q^(m/q)=imqt3/2eπm2/(qt), so [F3] gives the same formula with the extra factor i and exponent t3/2. Thus in both cases θχ(t)=ε(χ)ta1/2θχ(1/t).

F3givenalgebra
2.1

Suppose first that q>1. Then χ(0)=0, so termwise integration for Res>1 and parity give 2Λ(s,χ)=0θχ(t)t(s+a)/21dt. Substitute t=1/u after using step 1.1; the exponent becomes u(1s+a)/21, so the right side is 2ε(χ)Λ(1s,χ). Thus the displayed equation holds for q>1 by [F1].

F1F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

For q=1, put θ(t)=nZeπn2t. Step 1.1 becomes θ(t)=t1/2θ(1/t), while termwise integration gives 2Λ(s,1)=0(θ(t)1)ts/21dt(Res>1). Splitting at 1 and substituting t=1/u in the first piece yields 2Λ(s,1)=1(θ(t)1)(ts/21+t(1s)/21)dt+2s(s1). The right side is invariant under s1s and supplies its meromorphic continuation, so Λ(s,1)=Λ(1s,1). Together with step 2.1 this proves the theorem.

F1F2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources