Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Primitive Dirichlet L Functions and Functional Equations

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page fixes e(x)=exp⁡(2πix) and f^(ξ)=∫Rf(x)e(−xξ) dx. It develops primitive characters, their Gauss sums, and the parity-sensitive theta argument leading to the completed Dirichlet L-function and its functional equation. The primitive principal character modulo 1 remains the zeta exception.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Induced Dirichlet characters

Definition

Let d∣q, and let χ∗ be a Dirichlet character modulo d. Its induction to modulus q is the Dirichlet character χ modulo q whose arithmetic function is χ(n)={χ∗(n),(n,q)=1,0,(n,q)>1. Equivalently, on units modulo q it is the pullback along reduction to units modulo d. Thus it can be zero at an integer which is a unit modulo d but not modulo q; this is stronger than merely composing unit-group maps.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Primitive Dirichlet characters and conductor

Definition

A character modulo q is primitive if it is not induced from a proper divisor of q. By Unique primitive ancestor of a Dirichlet character, every character has a unique primitive ancestor; its modulus is the conductor. The principal character modulo 1 is primitive and has conductor 1.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Unique primitive ancestor of a Dirichlet character

Statement

Every Dirichlet character modulo q is induced by a unique primitive character of a conductor dividing q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A character χ modulo q.

[F1]

Reduction modulo a divisor gives the stated zero-extended induction (Induced Dirichlet characters).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Write q=∏pep. For each p, choose the least cp≤ep for which the local unit character factors through reduction modulo pcp; the finite set of possible exponents has such a least element.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

CRT combines the resulting local characters into a character χ∗ modulo d=∏pcp, and [F1] shows that its induction has the same values as χ, including zero precisely on the nonunits modulo q.

3.1F2step 1.1∎

If a primitive character modulo d′ induces χ, each of its local exponents must be at least cp; minimality gives d∣d′. If d′>d, its local character factors through a proper divisor, contradicting primitivity. Hence d′=d and CRT gives χ∗=χ∗′.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Finite Euler factors under character induction

Statement

If χ modulo q is induced by its primitive ancestor χ∗ modulo d, then, for Re⁡s>1, L(s,χ)=L(s,χ∗)∏p∣q, p∤d(1−χ∗(p)p−s).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The indicated induced pair and Re⁡s>1.

[F1]

The ancestor has conductor dividing q (Unique primitive ancestor of a Dirichlet character).

[F2]

Dirichlet L-functions have their absolutely convergent Euler products in this half-plane (Euler product for Dirichlet L-functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

In [F2], the local factors of χ and χ∗ agree unless p∣q but p∤d; at exactly those primes χ(p)=0, while the primitive factor is (1−χ∗(p)p−s)−1.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Cancelling all common local factors and multiplying the finite exceptional set gives the displayed identity.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Gauss sum of a Dirichlet character

Definition

Put e(x)=exp⁡(2πix). For a character χ modulo q, its Gauss sum is τ(χ)=∑a mod qχ(a)e(a/q). The displayed additive character and the complete residue system fix its phase.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Primitive Gauss-sum twist

Statement

If χ is primitive modulo q, then for every integer m, ∑a mod qχ(a)e(am/q)=χ(m)‾τ(χ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive χ modulo q and m∈Z.

[F1]

The normalization of τ(χ) is fixed above (Gauss sum of a Dirichlet character).

[F2]

Primitivity excludes induction from a proper divisor (Primitive Dirichlet characters and conductor).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1F1givenassume-case unit

If (m,q)=1, substitution b=am permutes the residue classes and gives the sum as χ(m)‾τ(χ).

2.1F2step 1.1assume-case nonunit

If g=(m,q)>1, choose a unit u≡1(modq/g) for which χ(u)≠1; otherwise the unit character factors modulo q/g, contrary to [F2]. Multiplication by u leaves e(am/q) unchanged and multiplies the sum by χ(u), so the sum is zero.

3.1step 2.1cases-exhaustive∎

In the second case χ(m)=0, so the right side is also zero; the two cases prove the formula.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Norm of a primitive Gauss sum

Statement

For a primitive character χ modulo q, ∣τ(χ)∣2=q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive character χ modulo q.

[F1]

The primitive twist identity holds for every integer (Primitive Gauss-sum twist).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

By the definition of the Gauss sum, τ(χ)‾=∑a mod qχ(a)‾e(−a/q). Multiplying by τ(χ) and using [F1] with m=a gives ∣τ(χ)∣2=∑a mod q∑b mod qχ(b)e(ab/q)e(−a/q).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The inner sum over a is q when b≡1(modq) and 0 otherwise. Thus only b=1 remains, and the expression in step 1.1 is qχ(1)=q.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Parity of a Dirichlet character

Definition

Since χ(−1)∈{1,−1}, define a∈{0,1} by χ(−1)=(−1)a. The character is even for a=0 and odd for a=1. The character modulo 1 is even.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Fourier transform of a Gaussian

Statement

For t>0 and f^(ξ)=∫Rf(x)e(−xξ) dx, e−πtx2^(ξ)=t−1/2e−πξ2/t.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: t>0; the Gaussian is a Schwartz function.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

Put G(ξ)=∫Re−πx2e(−xξ) dx. The Gaussian integral The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π, followed by u=πx, gives G(0)=1. On every compact ξ-interval, the derivative of the integrand is dominated by a constant multiple of ∣x∣e−πx2, so Differentiation under an improper multiple integral under an integrable derivative bound applied to real and imaginary parts gives G′(ξ)=∫R(−2πix)e−πx2e(−xξ) dx.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Since (e−πx2)′=−2πxe−πx2, integration by parts on [−R,R] and then R→∞ (the boundary term tends to 0) yields G′(ξ)=−2πξG(ξ). Hence (eπξ2G(ξ))′=0, and step 1.1 gives G(ξ)=e−πξ2.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substitute u=tx in the defining integral and apply step 2.1 to obtain the stated t−1/2 scaling.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Poisson summation

Statement

For every Schwartz function f under f^(ξ)=∫f(x)e(−xξ)dx, ∑n∈Zf(n)=∑m∈Zf^(m).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Schwartz function f.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

Define the periodization F(x)=∑n∈Zf(x+n). Schwartz decay makes this series, and every termwise derivative series, converge uniformly on compact sets, so F is a smooth 1-periodic function.

2.1step 1.1

Its mth Fourier coefficient is ∫01F(x)e(−mx) dx=∑n∈Z∫01f(x+n)e(−m(x+n)) dx=f^(m), where absolute convergence justifies interchange and the intervals [n,n+1] partition R.

3.1step 2.1∎

The sequence (f^(m))m∈Z is rapidly decreasing, so the Fourier series of F converges absolutely and uniformly to F. Evaluating at 0 gives ∑n∈Zf(n)=F(0)=∑m∈Zf^(m).

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Twisted Poisson summation

Statement

For primitive χ modulo q and Schwartz f, ∑n∈Zχ(n)f(n)=τ(χ)q∑m∈Zχ(m)‾f^(m/q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive character χ modulo q and a Schwartz function f.

[F1]

Poisson summation holds for Schwartz functions (Poisson summation).

[F2]

The primitive additive twist is χ(m)‾τ(χ) (Primitive Gauss-sum twist).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Decompose the left side by n≡a(modq) and apply [F1] to each translated, q-scaled Schwartz function.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The finite coefficient of f^(m/q)/q is ∑a mod qχ(a)e(am/q), which is [F2]. Substitution gives the formula.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Completed primitive Dirichlet L-function

Definition

For primitive χ modulo q of parity a, define Λ(s,χ)=(qπ)(s+a)/2Γ((s+a)/2)L(s,χ). This is the completed function, not the entire xi-function used in a theta proof.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Analytic continuation of primitive Dirichlet L-functions

Statement

If primitive χ is nonprincipal, then L(s,χ) and Λ(s,χ) extend to entire functions. For the principal primitive character modulo 1, L=ζ is meromorphic with its unique simple pole at s=1, while Λ(s,χ)=π−s/2Γ(s/2)ζ(s) is meromorphic with simple poles at s=0 and s=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive character χ modulo q of parity a.

[F1]

The Gaussian has the stated Fourier transform (Fourier transform of a Gaussian).

[F2]

Twisted Poisson summation has the displayed q-normalization (Twisted Poisson summation).

[F4]

The reciprocal 1/Γ(z) extends to an entire function (The Weierstrass product for reciprocal Gamma).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Suppose first that χ is nonprincipal, so q>1 and χ(0)=0. Put Θχ(t)=∑n∈Zχ(n)nae−πn2t/q for t>0, with n0=1 also at n=0. Since χ(−1)=(−1)a, the positive and negative terms pair. Termwise Mellin integration, absolutely valid for Re⁡s>1, gives ∫0∞Θχ(t)t(s+a)/2−1 dt=2(qπ)(s+a)/2Γ((s+a)/2)L(s,χ)=2Λ(s,χ). The last equality is the exact normalization of Completed primitive Dirichlet L-function.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Apply [F2] to xae−πtx2/q. For a=0, [F1] gives its Fourier transform directly. For a=1, differentiating that transform with respect to frequency and using xf^(ξ)=−(2πi)−1(f^)′(ξ) gives the extra factor −iqξ/t. Thus in both parity cases Θχ(t)=τ(χ)iaq t−a−1/2Θχˉ(1/t). The transformed character also has zero constant term because q>1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F4algebra

Split the Mellin integral of step 1.1 at t=1 and use step 2.1 on (0,1), then substitute u=1/t. Writing ϵχ=τ(χ)/(iaq) gives 2Λ(s,χ)=∫1∞Θχ(t)t(s+a)/2−1 dt+ϵχ∫1∞Θχˉ(u)u(1−s+a)/2−1 du. Both theta kernels and all their derivatives in the displayed complex powers decay exponentially as the real variable tends to infinity, since their zero terms vanish and their remaining summands are a fixed polynomial times a Gaussian. Uniform domination on every compact s-set makes both integrals entire in s. They therefore continue Λ(s,χ) entirely. Since 1/Γ((s+a)/2) is entire by [F4] and the other completion factor is entire and nonzero, L(s,χ) is entire too.

4.1F1F2F4step 1.1algebra∎

The only primitive principal character has q=1 (Primitive Dirichlet characters and conductor). Now a=0 and Θ(t)=∑n∈Ze−πn2t has constant term 1, with Θ(t)=t−1/2Θ(1/t) by [F1] and [F2]. For Re⁡s>1, 2Λ(s)=∫0∞(Θ(t)−1)ts/2−1 dt. Splitting at 1 and using Θ(t)−1=t−1/2(Θ(1/t)−1)+t−1/2−1 gives 2Λ(s)=∫1∞(Θ(t)−1)ts/2−1 dt+∫1∞(Θ(t)−1)t(1−s)/2−1 dt+2s−1−2s. The integrals are entire by Gaussian decay. Their boundary terms give exactly simple poles at 1 and 0, with nonzero residues 1 and −1 for Λ. Multiplication by the entire reciprocal Gamma from [F4] cancels the pole at 0 without introducing another pole, while its value at 1/2 is nonzero by the product formula. Thus L=ζ has exactly one simple pole, at 1.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Functional equation for primitive Dirichlet L-functions

Statement

For primitive χ modulo q of parity a, Λ(s,χ)=ε(χ)Λ(1−s,χ‾),ε(χ)=(−i)aτ(χ)/q. For q=1 this is the zeta functional equation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive character χ modulo q of parity a.

[F1]

The completion continues as stated (Analytic continuation of primitive Dirichlet L-functions).

[F2]

Its normalization is fixed in Completed primitive Dirichlet L-function.

[F3]

The Gaussian transform and twisted Poisson formula have the stated normalizations (Fourier transform of a Gaussian, Twisted Poisson summation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3givenalgebra

Define, for t>0, θχ(t)=∑n∈Znaχ(n)e−πn2t/q. For a=0, [F3] applied to x↦e−πtx2/q gives θχ(t)=τ(χ)q t−1/2θχ‾(1/t). For a=1, differentiating the Gaussian transform gives xe−πtx2/q^(m/q)=−i mq t−3/2e−πm2/(qt), so [F3] gives the same formula with the extra factor −i and exponent t−3/2. Thus in both cases θχ(t)=ε(χ)t−a−1/2θχ‾(1/t).

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Suppose first that q>1. Then χ(0)=0, so termwise integration for Re⁡s>1 and parity give 2Λ(s,χ)=∫0∞θχ(t)t(s+a)/2−1 dt. Substitute t=1/u after using step 1.1; the exponent becomes u(1−s+a)/2−1, so the right side is 2ε(χ)Λ(1−s,χ‾). Thus the displayed equation holds for q>1 by [F1].

3.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

For q=1, put θ(t)=∑n∈Ze−πn2t. Step 1.1 becomes θ(t)=t−1/2θ(1/t), while termwise integration gives 2Λ(s,1)=∫0∞(θ(t)−1)ts/2−1 dt(Re⁡s>1). Splitting at 1 and substituting t=1/u in the first piece yields 2Λ(s,1)=∫1∞(θ(t)−1)(ts/2−1+t(1−s)/2−1) dt+2s(s−1). The right side is invariant under s↦1−s and supplies its meromorphic continuation, so Λ(s,1)=Λ(1−s,1). Together with step 2.1 this proves the theorem.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Unit modulus of the Dirichlet root number

Statement

For primitive χ, ∣ε(χ)∣=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive character χ.

[F1]

ε(χ)=(−i)aτ(χ)/q (Functional equation for primitive Dirichlet L-functions).

[F2]

∣τ(χ)∣2=q (Norm of a primitive Gauss sum).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Taking absolute values in [F1] gives ∣ε(χ)∣=∣τ(χ)∣/q.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Fact [F2] makes this quotient 1.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Parity-forced trivial zeros

Statement

For primitive nonprincipal χ of parity a, L(−a−2m,χ)=0 for every m≥0. Thus 0 occurs only in the even nonprincipal case; no zero at 0 is asserted for the principal character modulo 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive nonprincipal χ of parity a.

[F1]

The completed function is entire for a primitive nonprincipal character (Analytic continuation of primitive Dirichlet L-functions).

[F2]

Gamma has simple poles at the nonpositive integers (Meromorphic continuation of Gamma).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2given

At s=−a−2m, Γ((s+a)/2) has a pole by [F2].

2.1F1step 1.1∎

The regularity in [F1] forces L(s,χ) to cancel that pole. The principal exception is outside the hypothesis.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources