How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The principal-divisor exact sequence for a Dedekind domain
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Dedekind domain with fraction field . Then the valuation maps fit into an exact sequence
where
and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a Dedekind domain with fraction field .
The divisor group is the free abelian group on the nonzero prime ideals (The divisor group of a Dedekind domain).
The class group is the quotient of nonzero fractional ideals by principal fractional ideals (The ideal class group).
The integer is defined by the equality (Prime-ideal valuations on fractional ideals).
Nonzero fractional ideals factor uniquely into finite products of prime powers (Unique factorization of nonzero fractional ideals into prime powers).
The class-group quotient is well defined (The ideal class group quotient is well defined).
Proof
The map is well defined and surjective: by [L1], every divisor is a finite sum and therefore determines a unique fractional ideal , and every ideal class has such a representative.
If , then [L1] applied to the principal fractional ideal gives
Therefore in . So .
Conversely, if satisfies , then the ideal is principal, say equal to with . Uniqueness in [L1] then forces . Thus .
If , then , so all valuations of are zero and . Conversely, if , then [L1] gives , which is exactly the statement that is a unit of . Hence .
Steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 2.1 prove exactness of the displayed sequence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mircea Mustata, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, §8.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. P. May, Notes on Dedekind Rings (standard reference, not scraped)