Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pure braid groups are torsion-free

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every n≥0 the pure braid group PBn=π1(Fn(D2),q) of The pure braid group PBn as the fundamental group of an ordered configuration space is torsion-free: if g∈PBn and m≥1 satisfy gm=e, then g=e. Equivalently, every nonidentity element of PBn has infinite order.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice and an integer n≥0; the pure braid groups PBn of the closed-disc convention, with the same base configuration q fixed throughout.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

PB0 and PB1 are the one-element groups, and the inclusion Fm(int⁡D2)→Fm(D2) induces an isomorphism π1(Fm(int⁡D2),q)→PBm at every configuration of interior points (The pure braid group PBn as the fundamental group of an ordered configuration space).

[F2]

Assume AC and let n≥2. The last-coordinate forgetful map φ:PBn→PBn−1 fits into a short exact sequence 1→Fn−1→κPBn→φPBn−1→1 with κ injective, φ surjective and im⁡κ=ker⁡φ, where Fn−1=π1(int⁡D2∖{q1,…,qn−1},qn) is a free group (The Fadell-Neuwirth short exact sequence for pure braids).

[F3]

Every free group is torsion-free: if G is free, x∈G and m≥1 satisfy xm=e, then x=e (Free groups are torsion-free).

[F4]

In ZF, AC implies DC, so the choice hypothesis of [F2] is available under [A1] (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Proof

technique · induction on $n$
1.1baseF1

The base cases. By [F1] the groups PB0 and PB1 are one-element groups, so their only element is the identity and is not a nonidentity element of finite order; hence PB0 and PB1 are torsion-free.

1.2F3

The torsion-freeness of the free fibre. By [F3] every free group is torsion-free; in particular this applies to the group Fn−1 of the exact sequence in [F2], so that if x∈Fn−1 and xm is the identity of Fn−1 for some m≥1, then x is the identity.

1.3A1F2F4

The exact sequence used in the successor step. Let n≥2. The Axiom of Choice [A1] holds, so by [F4] the choice hypothesis of [F2] is met and [F2] supplies the short exact sequence 1→Fn−1→κPBn→φPBn−1→1 for the last-coordinate forgetful map φ: the map φ is a surjective homomorphism, κ is an injective homomorphism, and im⁡κ=ker⁡φ. The Axiom of Choice is used only to invoke [F2]; no further choice is made in this proof.

1.4ih

Induction hypothesis. Fix n≥2 and assume that PBn−1 is torsion-free: every y∈PBn−1 with ym=e for some m≥1 equals e.

2.1step 1.3step 1.4step 1.2

The successor step. Let g∈PBn and m≥1 satisfy gm=e, where e denotes the identity of PBn. Since φ is a homomorphism, φ(g)m=φ(gm)=φ(e)=e in PBn−1, so φ(g)=e by the induction hypothesis of step 1.4. Hence g∈ker⁡φ=im⁡κ, and there is x∈Fn−1 with g=κ(x). Then κ(xm)=κ(x)m=gm=e; since κ is injective, xm is the identity of Fn−1, so x is the identity by step 1.2, and therefore g=κ(x)=e. Thus every element of PBn of finite order is the identity, that is, PBn is torsion-free.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1discharge-induction

Induction conclusion. Step 1.1 establishes the statement for n=0 and n=1, and step 2.1 proves the successor implication for every n≥2; by induction on n, PBn is torsion-free for every n≥0.

The argument applies only to the pure braid groups: torsion-freeness of the kernel PBn and finiteness of the quotient Sn of the full braid group Bn are not used to make any claim about torsion in Bn itself. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources