How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pure braid groups are torsion-free
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every the pure braid group of The pure braid group as the fundamental group of an ordered configuration space is torsion-free: if and satisfy , then . Equivalently, every nonidentity element of has infinite order.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and an integer ; the pure braid groups of the closed-disc convention, with the same base configuration fixed throughout.
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
and are the one-element groups, and the inclusion induces an isomorphism at every configuration of interior points (The pure braid group as the fundamental group of an ordered configuration space).
Assume AC and let . The last-coordinate forgetful map fits into a short exact sequence with injective, surjective and , where is a free group (The Fadell-Neuwirth short exact sequence for pure braids).
Every free group is torsion-free: if is free, and satisfy , then (Free groups are torsion-free).
In ZF, AC implies DC, so the choice hypothesis of [F2] is available under [A1] (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Proof
The base cases. By [F1] the groups and are one-element groups, so their only element is the identity and is not a nonidentity element of finite order; hence and are torsion-free.
The torsion-freeness of the free fibre. By [F3] every free group is torsion-free; in particular this applies to the group of the exact sequence in [F2], so that if and is the identity of for some , then is the identity.
The exact sequence used in the successor step. Let . The Axiom of Choice [A1] holds, so by [F4] the choice hypothesis of [F2] is met and [F2] supplies the short exact sequence for the last-coordinate forgetful map : the map is a surjective homomorphism, is an injective homomorphism, and . The Axiom of Choice is used only to invoke [F2]; no further choice is made in this proof.
Induction hypothesis. Fix and assume that is torsion-free: every with for some equals .
The successor step. Let and satisfy , where denotes the identity of . Since is a homomorphism, in , so by the induction hypothesis of step 1.4. Hence , and there is with . Then ; since is injective, is the identity of , so is the identity by step 1.2, and therefore . Thus every element of of finite order is the identity, that is, is torsion-free.
Induction conclusion. Step 1.1 establishes the statement for and , and step 2.1 proves the successor implication for every ; by induction on , is torsion-free for every .
The argument applies only to the pure braid groups: torsion-freeness of the kernel and finiteness of the quotient of the full braid group are not used to make any claim about torsion in itself. ∎
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.