How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A T-query bit algorithm has an acceptance polynomial of degree at most 2T
Statement
If a local bit-query algorithm makes at most queries on every branch, then its full-cube acceptance probability is represented on by a real multilinear polynomial of total degree at most . Consequently, if it computes with error at most on a promise domain , then . For , this yields
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A local bit-query algorithm with at most queries on each branch and a Boolean promise function that computes within error .
Oracle-only bit-query algorithm: all non-oracle operations, branch structure, root state, output wires and accepting subset are fixed independently of ; output probabilities sum over finite branches and unmeasured labels.
Unnormalized branch density entries have degree at most twice the query count: every entry of the unnormalized density operator at a history with queries is represented by a complex polynomial of degree at most .
Acceptance polynomials and approximate degree on Boolean domains: an acceptance polynomial agrees with the algorithm's acceptance probability on the full cube, and approximate degree is constrained only on .
Local bounded-error bit-query complexity: for , is the finite minimum feasible worst-branch query count.
is multilinear, agrees with at every point of , is degree-nonincreasing when nonzero, and is the unique multilinear polynomial with that agreement: multilinear reduction agrees on the Boolean cube and replaces every monomial by its squarefree support monomial, without increasing total degree.
Proof
For each terminal history , the accepting probability contribution is the finite sum of the diagonal entries of over accepting output strings and all unmeasured basis labels. This is the output law of [F1], with the unnormalized branch operator of [F2]. Every summand has a complex polynomial representative of degree at most , so their finite sum has degree at most on the Boolean cube.
For each Boolean input , the sum in step 1.1 is the real probability . Replace each coefficient of by its real part to obtain a real polynomial ; for Boolean , , and no supported monomial has degree greater than . Let be its multilinear reduction from [F5]. Each monomial is replaced by a squarefree monomial of no larger degree, so is real multilinear with the same support degree bound, including when it is zero or . It agrees with on the Boolean cube and is therefore an acceptance polynomial by [F3].
If has error at most on , then [F3] makes an -approximant, so . For , this holds for every feasible , in particular for the minimum query count [F4]. Since query counts are integers, the result is the displayed ceiling inequality.
Depends on
- Oracle-only bit-query algorithm
- Acceptance polynomials and approximate degree on Boolean domains
- Local bounded-error bit-query complexity
- Unnormalized branch density entries have degree at most twice the query count
- Normalized output law for finite quantum query branches
- $\widetilde f$ is multilinear, agrees with $f$ at every point of $\{0,1\}^{n}$, is degree-nonincreasing when nonzero, and is the unique multilinear polynomial with that agreement
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (2025), §21.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (arXiv:1907.09415), §11.2 (standard reference, not scraped)