How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The exact polynomial degree of OR is N
Statement
For , let when and otherwise. Its exact approximate degree is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and the total Boolean function .
Acceptance polynomials and approximate degree on Boolean domains: exact approximate degree is the least total-degree bound of a real polynomial agreeing with the function on the domain.
Symmetrizing a Boolean-cube polynomial gives a Hamming-weight polynomial: a permutation-invariant exact approximant can be replaced by a univariate polynomial of no larger degree taking the same values on every Hamming-weight layer.
A nonzero real polynomial of degree has no more than distinct real roots: a nonzero degree- real polynomial has at most distinct real roots.
Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration and Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in : finite products of linear coordinate polynomials are real polynomials with total degree at most the number of factors.
Proof
The polynomial has total degree at most by [F4]. At a Boolean vector , the product is exactly when all bits are zero and is otherwise, so . Thus [F1] gives .
Let be any exact polynomial approximant of degree at most . Since OR is invariant under coordinate permutations, [F2] gives a univariate of degree at most with and for each integer . Therefore the nonzero polynomial has the distinct roots and is nonzero because . By [F3], its degree is at least , so . Hence every exact approximant has degree at least .
The upper and lower bounds of steps 1.1 and 1.2 coincide, proving the equality.
Depends on
- Acceptance polynomials and approximate degree on Boolean domains
- Symmetrizing a Boolean-cube polynomial gives a Hamming-weight polynomial
- A nonzero real polynomial of degree $n$ has no more than $n$ distinct real roots
- Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration
- Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in $F[x_1,\dots,x_n]$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (2025), §21.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (arXiv:1907.09415), §11.2 (standard reference, not scraped)