How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded-error parity query lower bound
Statement
Any quantum query algorithm that, on every , outputs with error at most using the coherent XOR oracle for makes at least oracle queries.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite parity promise task and the coherent XOR oracle of Coherent XOR function oracle.
Promise problem: correctness is required on every input in the declared promise.
Query-model convention: the finite register starts in a fixed input-independent state, each inter-query unitary is independent of , and the output is a designated computational-basis bit measured after the last unitary. A -query algorithm has at most oracle calls on every input. These are conventions of the query model, not consequences of the circuit-description encoding in Full-list uniform quantum circuit family.
Coherent XOR function oracle: on every basis string, with a query charged only for the named oracle.
A total Boolean XOR oracle is unitary and involutive: the total XOR oracle permutes the finite basis and is a unitary involution even when the queried function is noninjective.
Proof
Given: A -query algorithm with the stated worst-case error.
Put . On a basis query address , the matrix entries of the XOR target flip are either or ; the input address and all other bits are unchanged. Thus one oracle call raises the degree of every amplitude polynomial in by at most one. The inter-query unitaries are input-independent by [F2] and take fixed linear combinations of amplitudes. Induction over the queries shows each final amplitude is a multilinear polynomial of degree at most , replacing any by without increasing degree.
The signed output expectation is a sum of squared moduli of final amplitudes with fixed signs, so it is a real multilinear polynomial of degree at most . If , the error bound gives pointwise. Therefore the uniform average of is positive.
If , every monomial of is for a proper subset . Under independent uniform signs, , since at least one independent sign appears to the first power and has mean zero. Linearity gives , contradicting step 2.1. Hence .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Beals, Buhrman, Cleve, Mosca, and de Wolf, Quantum Lower Bounds by Polynomials, §§3.2–4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, Chapter 28 §28.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, polynomial method discussion (standard reference, not scraped)