How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simon rank growth probability
Statement
Let and consider a finite history with accepted rows in the Simon rank process. These rows are independent by the acceptance rule, so the current rank is . The next independent sample increases the rank with probability
Writing , for each fixed rank- history and every , let be the event, in the finite continuation experiment of the next fresh samples, that all fail to raise rank. For , let on the finite -sample continuation experiment be the number of samples up to the first rank increase, capped at , with value if no increase occurs in that prefix. Then
and the expected truncated waiting count is
All probabilities and expectations here are over finite continuation experiments; no probability measure on infinite sample histories is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fixed Simon oracle, , and a finite history with accepted rows.
Simon independent-sample rank process: the accepted rows span , and fresh independent Simon samples are taken until rank .
Simon samples uniformly from s-perp: a fresh sample is uniform on .
The Simon annihilator is an (n−1)-dimensional binary subspace: has dimension and elements.
The coordinate vector space over F2 and Binary residue carrier and operations: coefficient lists are in , with each coordinate chosen from .
The quotient Z/2 is the binary field: is a field.
Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent: an accepted list is independent when its only zero linear combination has all coefficients zero.
Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing and is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of , and : the span consists exactly of finite linear combinations of the accepted rows.
Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis and Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis: a basis is an independent spanning set, and the dimension is the size of a finite basis.
Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities: every finite-prefix outcome space has nonnegative weights summing to one.
Real random variables on finite probability spaces and their finite distributions: a real random variable on a finite probability space is a function on that finite outcome set.
Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space: expectation is the finite sum of value times outcome weight.
For , , and for the series diverges: if , then .
Proof
By [F1], each accepted row was outside the span of its predecessors. In a zero linear combination, if the last nonzero coefficient were , that row would be a combination of its predecessors, contradicting acceptance; since the only nonzero scalar is , this proves inductively that the accepted list is independent by [F6]. It spans by [F7], hence is a basis by [F8]. The coefficient map from to is injective by independence and surjective by span; [F4] gives possible coefficient lists, so .
By [F2]–[F3], samples are uniform on the elements of , and [F1] gives . Exactly lie in by step 1.1, so the probability the next sample is accepted is , while the failure probability is .
Condition on any rank- history and use the finite -sample continuation experiment. Let be the event that every one of those samples lies in the current span . On this event the span remains throughout; by freshness, each conditional failure probability is , so multiplying the finite conditional probabilities gives . For , is the whole one-outcome empty continuation and has probability .
For each finite horizon , the explicitly defined is a function on the finite experiment by [F9]–[F10]. For every , the event is the event after projection to its first samples, so . The expectation definition [F11] and step 3.1 give . Since , [F12] bounds these partial sums by .
Depends on
- Simon independent-sample rank process
- Simon samples uniformly from s-perp
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
- Real random variables on finite probability spaces and their finite distributions
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
- For $|r| < 1$, $\sum_{k \ge 0} r^k = 1/(1-r)$, and for $|r| \ge 1$ the series diverges
- Binary residue carrier and operations
- The coordinate vector space over F2
- The quotient Z/2 is the binary field
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
- $\operatorname{span}(S)$ is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of $S$, and $\operatorname{span}(\varnothing) = \{0_V\}$
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span $\operatorname{span}(S)$ as the smallest linear subspace containing $S$
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- The Simon annihilator is an (n−1)-dimensional binary subspace
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (arXiv:1907.09415v6, 2026) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Information, Chapter 6: Quantum Algorithms (updated November 2020) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (17 April 2025) (standard reference, not scraped)