Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

CSS encoding dimension and commutation

Statement

Let C2⊆C1≤F2n, n≥1, and k=dim⁡C1−dim⁡C2. The coset vectors from CSS code from nested binary codes define an isometric encoding of k logical qubits. For every c∈C2 and h∈C1⊥, Xc and Zh commute, and each fixes every encoded coset vector. Their common +1 eigenspace is exactly this encoding. The conclusion requires only C2⊆C1; it does not require C2⊥⊆C1.

Moreover, for every x∈C1, the Hadamard transform is

H⊗n∣x+C2⟩=2−k/2∑y+C1⊥∈C2⊥/C1⊥(−1)x⋅y∣y+C1⊥⟩.

The phase is independent of the representatives x+C2 and y+C1⊥.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nested pair C2⊆C1≤F2n, the ordered computational basis, and the Pauli operators Xc,Zh.

[F1]

CSS code from nested binary codes: each coset vector is ∣C2∣−1/2∑u∈C2∣x+u⟩, with labels in C1/C2.

[F2]

Bilinear dual of a finite-field linear code: C⊥ is defined by the standard bilinear dot product on binary coordinate vectors.

[F3]

Dimension of the binary dual code: dim⁡C⊥=n−dim⁡C for every binary linear code C.

[F4]

The computational basis is orthonormal: distinct computational basis vectors are orthogonal unit vectors.

[F5]

The Pauli matrices: X∣b⟩=∣b+1⟩ and Z∣b⟩=(−1)b∣b⟩ for b∈F2.

[F6]

Pauli commutator is symplectic pairing: Pauli operators commute exactly when their binary labels have symplectic pairing zero.

[F7]

Exact one-qubit gates and rotations: the Hadamard matrix is H=2−1/2(111−1).

[F8]

Stabilizer code space: the stabilizer code space is the common +1 eigenspace of all checks.

[F9]

Stabilizer projector and code dimension: a stabilizer generated by r independent commuting Hermitian checks has common +1 eigenspace of dimension 2n−r, provided −I is not in the generated group.

Proof

1.1F1F4algebra

There are ∣C2∣ distinct basis vectors in each coset sum. By [F4], its squared norm is ∣C2∣−1∣C2∣=1. Distinct cosets have disjoint supports, so their vectors are orthogonal. By [F1] there are ∣C1/C2∣=2dim⁡C1−dim⁡C2=2k such vectors, giving an orthonormal basis indexed by a k-bit logical register.

1.2F1F5given

By [F5], for c∈C2, Xc sends ∣x+u⟩ to ∣x+u+c⟩. Translation u↦u+c permutes C2, so Xc fixes the whole coset sum. For h∈C1⊥, each x+u∈C1 and therefore (−1)h⋅(x+u)=1; the diagonal operator Zh fixes every term. Thus both check families fix every encoded basis state and hence their linear span.

1.3F2F6given

The binary labels of Xc and Zh are (c,0) and (0,h). Their symplectic pairing is c⋅h. Since c∈C2⊆C1 and h∈C1⊥, this dot product is zero by [F2].

1.4F1F7construct

On a computational basis vector ∣w⟩, multiplying the one-bit Hadamard formulas from [F7] gives H⊗n∣w⟩=2−n/2∑y∈F2n(−1)y⋅w∣y⟩. Substituting the coset definition [F1] yields H⊗n∣x+C2⟩=2−n/2∣C2∣−1/2∑y∈F2n(−1)y⋅x(∑u∈C2(−1)y⋅u)∣y⟩. For y∈C2⊥, the inner sum is ∣C2∣. Otherwise choose u0∈C2 with y⋅u0=1; translation u↦u+u0 pairs terms with opposite signs, so the sum is zero.

2.1F1F3step 1.3algebra

Choose independent bases of C2 and C1⊥. Their separate X- and Z-type labels are independent: a zero combined label has both binary halves zero. By [F3] the combined number is dim⁡C2+n−dim⁡C1=n−k. This includes k=0.

3.1F1F8F9step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1construct

The checks are commuting Hermitian Paulis by steps 1.3 and [F5]. They fix the nonzero encoding from step 1.2, so their generated group cannot contain −I. Step 2.1 gives n−k independent checks; [F9] therefore gives their common +1 eigenspace dimension 2n−(n−k)=2k. By step 1.1 the encoding has dimension 2k, and step 1.2 says it lies in that eigenspace. Equal finite dimensions force equality: the CSS encoding is exactly the stabilizer code space [F8].

4.1F1F3step 1.4algebra∎

The transformed vector is supported exactly on C2⊥, with constant magnitude on that set. Since x∈C1, the phase (−1)x⋅y is constant on each coset of C1⊥ in C2⊥. Grouping terms by those cosets gives H⊗n∣x+C2⟩=2−k/2∑y+C1⊥∈C2⊥/C1⊥(−1)x⋅y∣y+C1⊥⟩. The coefficient is 2−k/2 because ∣C2∣∣C1⊥∣/2n=2−k by [F3]. This is the dual coset basis Fourier transform; the pairing is independent of representatives since C2⊆C1 and C1⊥⊆C2⊥.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources