Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fusion multiplicity spaces are finite-dimensional inner-product spaces

Statement

Let a,b,c be simple objects in a unitary fusion category. The pairing on Vabc=Hom⁡(a⊗b,c) defined by f∘g†=⟨f,g⟩id⁡c is a finite-dimensional positive-definite Hermitian inner product, linear in the first variable and conjugate-linear in the second.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a unitary fusion category C and simple objects a,b,c.

[F1]

Unitary fusion category: morphism adjoints are conjugate-linear, reverse composition, and are involutive; each f†f is C∗-positive; a positive scalar endomorphism of a simple object is a nonnegative real multiple of its identity; f†f=0 implies f=0; and morphism spaces are finite-dimensional.

[F2]

Absolutely simple objects: for a simple charge c in this complex fusion category, End⁡(c)=Cid⁡c and id⁡c≠0.

[F3]

Fusion multiplicity space: Vabc=Hom⁡(a⊗b,c) and ⟨f,g⟩ is defined by f∘g†=⟨f,g⟩id⁡c.

Proof

Given: C,a,b,c as above.

1.1F1F2F3given

The category is finite and semisimple, so Vabc is a finite-dimensional complex vector space by [F1]. By [F2], every f∘g†∈End⁡(c) is a unique scalar multiple of the nonzero identity; hence the scalar pairing in [F3] exists and is unique.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

For scalars λ,μ∈C and f,h,g∈Vabc, linearity of composition gives (λf+μh)g†=λfg†+μhg†, while conjugate-linearity of dagger gives f(λg+μh)†=λˉfg†+μˉfh†. Taking the unique scalar coefficients from [F2] proves linearity in the first argument and conjugate-linearity in the second. Taking daggers of fg†=⟨f,g⟩id⁡c gives gf†=⟨f,g⟩‾id⁡c, so ⟨g,f⟩=⟨f,g⟩‾.

1.3F1F2F3algebra

For each f∈Vabc, ff†=(f†)†∘f† is positive in End⁡(c) by [F1], so its scalar coefficient ⟨f,f⟩ is real and nonnegative. If ⟨f,f⟩=0, then (f†)†∘f†=0; the nondegeneracy clause of [F1], applied to the morphism f†, gives f†=0 and then f=0. Thus ⟨f,f⟩>0 whenever f≠0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

The pairing is finite-dimensional by step 1.1, sesquilinear and Hermitian by step 1.2, and positive definite by step 1.3. If Vabc=0, scalar uniqueness in step 1.1 still holds and positive definiteness is vacuous because there are no nonzero vectors. These are exactly the inner-product axioms, with the stated linear-first convention.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Fusion multiplicity space.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources