How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fusion multiplicity spaces are finite-dimensional inner-product spaces
Statement
Let be simple objects in a unitary fusion category. The pairing on defined by is a finite-dimensional positive-definite Hermitian inner product, linear in the first variable and conjugate-linear in the second.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a unitary fusion category and simple objects .
Unitary fusion category: morphism adjoints are conjugate-linear, reverse composition, and are involutive; each is -positive; a positive scalar endomorphism of a simple object is a nonnegative real multiple of its identity; implies ; and morphism spaces are finite-dimensional.
Absolutely simple objects: for a simple charge in this complex fusion category, and .
Fusion multiplicity space: and is defined by .
Proof
Given: as above.
The category is finite and semisimple, so is a finite-dimensional complex vector space by [F1]. By [F2], every is a unique scalar multiple of the nonzero identity; hence the scalar pairing in [F3] exists and is unique.
For scalars and , linearity of composition gives , while conjugate-linearity of dagger gives . Taking the unique scalar coefficients from [F2] proves linearity in the first argument and conjugate-linearity in the second. Taking daggers of gives , so .
For each , is positive in by [F1], so its scalar coefficient is real and nonnegative. If , then ; the nondegeneracy clause of [F1], applied to the morphism , gives and then . Thus whenever .
The pairing is finite-dimensional by step 1.1, sesquilinear and Hermitian by step 1.2, and positive definite by step 1.3. If , scalar uniqueness in step 1.1 still holds and positive definiteness is vacuous because there are no nonzero vectors. These are exactly the inner-product axioms, with the stated linear-first convention.
Depends on
Used by
- Fusion-basis gauge change Definition
- Multiplicity-aware fusion-tree basis Definition
- R-symbol as a channel exchange map Definition
- Fusion-tree basis and dimension recursion Lemma
- F-symbol unitarity Theorem
- R-symbol unitarity Theorem
- Unitary fusion paths form an orthonormal Hilbert basis Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Fusion multiplicity space.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Penneys, Unitary Fusion Categories, Math 8800 lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)