Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hexagon in F/R coordinates

Statement

Let C be a unitary braided fusion category with associator α and braiding c. For all objects X,Y,Z, its two hexagons are

αY,Z,X∘cX,Y⊗Z∘αX,Y,Z=(id⁡Y⊗cX,Z)∘αY,X,Z∘(cX,Y⊗id⁡Z),

αZ,X,Y−1∘cX⊗Y,Z∘αX,Y,Z−1=(cX,Z⊗id⁡Y)∘αX,Z,Y−1∘(id⁡X⊗cY,Z).

For simple input charges and a fixed simple total charge, the two route matrices in each equation are equal in fusion-tree coordinates. Each entry is the sum over all intermediate simple charges and multiplicity indices of the products of the corresponding F- and R-block entries.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a braided fusion category, simple input charges, a simple total charge, and the orthonormal fusion-tree bases.

[F1]

Braiding: the braiding is a natural isomorphism and satisfies the two hexagon equations displayed in the Statement.

[F2]

F-symbol as a recoupling matrix: each associator change between tree bases is represented by the corresponding F block, with all multiplicity indices.

[F3]

R-symbol as a channel exchange map: each braiding exchange on a channel is represented by the corresponding typed R block.

[F4]

Fusion-tree basis and dimension recursion: each intermediate tree space has a complete basis indexed by all admissible simple labels and vertex multiplicity indices.

Proof

1.1F2F3F4construct

On a fixed fusion-tree basis, the matrix of each associator factor is the appropriate F block by [F2], and the matrix of each channel exchange is the appropriate R block by [F3]. An identity factor preserves all untouched labels and multiplicity indices. If a braiding input is a tensor product rather than a simple charge, decompose it into its finite simple summands; its matrix is the resulting finite block matrix, with the summand and multiplicity indices kept. Thus every factor in either hexagon composite has a specified finite matrix.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

For the first hexagon, let M1,M2,M3 be the matrices of αX,Y,Z, cX,Y⊗Z, and αY,Z,X in order along its left route, and let N1,N2,N3 be those of cX,Y⊗id⁡Z, αY,X,Z, and id⁡Y⊗cX,Z along its right route. For fixed endpoint indices x,z, the entries are respectively ∑u,v(M3)z,v(M2)v,u(M1)u,x and ∑u′,v′(N3)z,v′(N2)v′,u′(N1)u′,x. Every intermediate index is the full tuple of simple charges and vertex multiplicity indices for that tree. The two structural maps are equal by the first hexagon [F1], so their coordinate entries and these finite sums are equal.

2.2F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

For the second hexagon, let P1,P2,P3 be the matrices of αX,Y,Z−1, cX⊗Y,Z, and αZ,X,Y−1 along its left route; let Q1,Q2,Q3 be those of id⁡X⊗cY,Z, αX,Z,Y−1, and cX,Z⊗id⁡Y along its right route. The entries at fixed endpoints are ∑u,v(P3)z,v(P2)v,u(P1)u,x and ∑u′,v′(Q3)z,v′(Q2)v′,u′(Q1)u′,x. The indices again range over every simple intermediate charge and multiplicity coordinate. The second root hexagon [F1] makes the structural maps equal, so the two finite sums agree.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

The two matrix equalities in steps 2.1 and 2.2 are the coordinate forms of the first and second hexagons, respectively, and each includes all admissible intermediate labels and multiplicities.

Hexagon diagrams

The first diagram shows the two routes from (X⊗Y)⊗Z to Y⊗(Z⊗X); the second shows the routes from X⊗(Y⊗Z) to (Z⊗X)⊗Y. The arrow labels are exactly the maps in the two displayed equations. They illustrate the equations; the proof above uses the typed composites and their matrix coefficients.

diagram failed to render:
((X\otimes Y)\otimes Z)
  \arrow[r,"\alpha_{X,Y,Z}"]
  \arrow[d,"c_{X,Y}\otimes\operatorname{id}_Z"']
& X\otimes(Y\otimes Z)
  \arrow[r,"c_{X,Y\otimes Z}"]
& (Y\otimes Z)\otimes X
  \arrow[d,"\alpha_{Y,Z,X}"] \\
(Y\otimes X)\otimes Z
  \arrow[r,"\alpha_{Y,X,Z}"']
& Y\otimes(X\otimes Z)
  \arrow[r,"\operatorname{id}_Y\otimes c_{X,Z}"']
& Y\otimes(Z\otimes X)
diagram failed to render:
X\otimes(Y\otimes Z)
  \arrow[r,"\operatorname{id}_X\otimes c_{Y,Z}"]
  \arrow[d,"\alpha_{X,Y,Z}^{-1}"']
& X\otimes(Z\otimes Y)
  \arrow[r,"\alpha_{X,Z,Y}^{-1}"]
& (X\otimes Z)\otimes Y
  \arrow[d,"c_{X,Z}\otimes\operatorname{id}_Y"] \\
(X\otimes Y)\otimes Z
  \arrow[r,"c_{X\otimes Y,Z}"']
& Z\otimes(X\otimes Y)
  \arrow[r,"\alpha_{Z,X,Y}^{-1}"']
& (Z\otimes X)\otimes Y

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources