How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two anticommuting toric logical Pauli pairs
Statement
The representatives of Noncontractible toric logical loops obey and commute within each Z pair and each X pair. Their four classes form a basis of the logical Pauli quotient of the two-qubit toric code.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The four specified normalizer representatives and the two-qubit toric stabilizer code.
Noncontractible toric logical loops: uses the horizontal primal row , the vertical primal column , uses , and uses .
Pauli commutator is symplectic pairing: the commutator sign of two Pauli strings is , where is their binary symplectic pairing; for pure X/Z supports it is the overlap parity.
Stabilizer syndromes and logical Pauli operators: logical Paulis are classes in , with scalar phases and stabilizers identified.
The periodic toric code encodes two qubits: the code encodes two qubits.
Dimension of the logical Pauli quotient: an -qubit stabilizer code encoding qubits has a binary logical Pauli quotient of dimension .
A single primal-dual crossing anticommutes: primal Z and dual X strings with exactly one shared physical edge anticommute.
Proof
By [F1], and share only , while and share only . [F6] gives anticommutation for these equal-index pairs. The cross pairs and have disjoint physical-edge supports, so [F2] gives commutation for unequal indices. Two Z strings commute with one another and two X strings commute with one another because their factors have the same Pauli type.
Suppose a product , with , represented the identity class in [F3]. It would then commute with every normalizer representative. Commuting with in turn and using step 1.1 forces . Hence the four classes are independent.
By [F4] the code has , and [F5] gives logical quotient dimension . The four independent classes from step 2.1 therefore form a basis of that quotient.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexei Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eric Dennis, Alexei Kitaev, Andrew Landahl, and John Preskill, Topological quantum memory (standard reference, not scraped)