Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two anticommuting toric logical Pauli pairs

Statement

The representatives Zˉ1,Zˉ2,Xˉ1,Xˉ2 of Noncontractible toric logical loops obey ZˉiXˉj=(−1)δijXˉjZˉi and commute within each Z pair and each X pair. Their four classes form a basis of the logical Pauli quotient of the two-qubit toric code.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The four specified normalizer representatives and the two-qubit toric stabilizer code.

[F1]

Noncontractible toric logical loops: Zˉ1 uses the horizontal primal row hi,0, Zˉ2 the vertical primal column v0,j, Xˉ1 uses h0,j, and Xˉ2 uses vi,0.

[F2]

Pauli commutator is symplectic pairing: the commutator sign of two Pauli strings is (−1)ω, where ω is their binary symplectic pairing; for pure X/Z supports it is the overlap parity.

[F3]

Stabilizer syndromes and logical Pauli operators: logical Paulis are classes in N(S)/(ZnS), with scalar phases and stabilizers identified.

[F4]

The periodic toric code encodes two qubits: the code encodes two qubits.

[F5]

Dimension of the logical Pauli quotient: an n-qubit stabilizer code encoding k qubits has a binary logical Pauli quotient of dimension 2k.

[F6]

A single primal-dual crossing anticommutes: primal Z and dual X strings with exactly one shared physical edge anticommute.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F6algebra

By [F1], Zˉ1 and Xˉ1 share only h0,0, while Zˉ2 and Xˉ2 share only v0,0. [F6] gives anticommutation for these equal-index pairs. The cross pairs (Zˉ1,Xˉ2) and (Zˉ2,Xˉ1) have disjoint physical-edge supports, so [F2] gives commutation for unequal indices. Two Z strings commute with one another and two X strings commute with one another because their factors have the same Pauli type.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Suppose a product Zˉ1aZˉ2bXˉ1cXˉ2d, with a,b,c,d∈F2, represented the identity class in [F3]. It would then commute with every normalizer representative. Commuting with Xˉ1,Xˉ2,Zˉ1,Zˉ2 in turn and using step 1.1 forces a=b=c=d=0. Hence the four classes are independent.

3.1F4F5step 2.1algebra∎

By [F4] the code has k=2, and [F5] gives logical quotient dimension 2k=4. The four independent classes from step 2.1 therefore form a basis of that quotient.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources