Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dimension of the logical Pauli quotient

Statement

Let n≥1 and let S be an n-qubit stabilizer group generated by r independent commuting Hermitian Pauli checks with −I∉S. Then the logical Pauli quotient N(S)/(ZnS) is a binary vector space of dimension 2(n−r). Consequently, it is nontrivial exactly when the stabilizer code encodes at least one qubit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1, a stabilizer subgroup S, its binary symplectic label space, and the normalizer/logical quotient convention.

[F1]

Binary Pauli label and quotient: quotienting phase-aware Paulis by the scalar center identifies their binary labels with Vn=F22n.

[F2]

Stabilizer labels form an isotropic space of the same rank: the label image W of S is an isotropic subspace of dimension r.

[F3]

Pauli commutator is symplectic pairing: a Pauli commutes with every element of S exactly when its label belongs to W⊥.

[F4]

Stabilizer syndromes and logical Pauli operators: the logical quotient is N(S)/(ZnS).

[F5]

Stabilizer projector and code dimension: the code dimension is 2n−r, so the encoded-qubit count is k=n−r.

[F6]

Binary symplectic form: ω is nondegenerate on Vn and dim⁡Vn=2n.

[F7]

If dim⁡FV=n and U is a linear subspace of V, then U is finite-dimensional, dim⁡FU≤n, and dim⁡FU=n if and only if U=V: every linearly independent subset of a finite-dimensional subspace extends to a basis, with no choice principle.

[F8]

Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T: the dimension of a finite-dimensional domain is the sum of the kernel dimension and image dimension.

[F9]

The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension: the algebraic dual of a finite-dimensional space has the same dimension.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4

By [F1], phase classes of Paulis are the vectors of Vn. By [F2] the stabilizer labels form an r-dimensional subspace W. The commutator criterion [F3] identifies the normalizer labels exactly with W⊥. The scalar phases label zero, so the subgroup ZnS has image W. Therefore N(S)/(ZnS) is identified with W⊥/W.

1.2F6F7F8F9construct

The nondegenerate pairing [F6] gives an injective map J:Vn→Vn∗, J(v)=ω(v,⋅). Restricting functionals from Vn to W is onto: extend a basis of W to one of Vn by [F7], then extend each functional by assigning zero to the added basis vectors. Since dim⁡Vn∗=dim⁡Vn=2n by [F9], injectivity and rank-nullity [F8] make J onto. Thus the composite Vn→W∗ is onto; its codomain has dimension r by [F9], and its kernel is W⊥. By [F8], dim⁡W⊥=2n−r.

2.1F2F5step 1.2algebra∎

Since W⊆W⊥, the quotient dimension is dim⁡(W⊥/W)=(2n−r)−r=2(n−r). By [F5], k=n−r is the number of encoded qubits; hence this dimension is 2k, which is zero exactly when k=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources