Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Noise-level noisy-network-coding inner bound for real Gaussian multicast networks

Statement

All mutual informations and rates in this item are measured in bits; differential entropies in the proof are in nats and are divided by ln⁡2.

In the real Gaussian multicast network of Real scalar Gaussian multicast relay network and power constraints, take independent Gaussian inputs Xi∼N(0,Pi) and independent Gaussian test-channel noises. For a chosen node set Q⊆[N], set Y^i=Yi+Z^i with Z^i∼N(0,1) for i∈Q and let Y^i be constant otherwise. Every nonnegative rate tuple satisfying ∑k∈A∩SRk<I(XA;Yd,Y^Ac∩Q∣XAc)−I(YA∩Q;Y^A∩Q∣X[N],Yd,Y^Ac∩Q) for every destination d∈D and every cut A⊆[N] with d∉A and A∩S≠∅ is achievable under the stated average-power constraints. The closure of the union of these strict regions over the stated choices, together with the all-zero tuple, is achievable.

In the special case Pi=P>0 for every node and Q=[N], a noise-level evaluation gives the sufficient cut inequalities ∑k∈A∩SRk<12log⁡2det⁡ ⁣(I+P2G(A)G(A)T)−∣A∣2 for every A⊆[N] with Ac∩D≠∅ and A∩S≠∅, where G(A)=GAc,A. Their closure is achievable. The all-zero rate tuple is always achievable by singleton source-message sets, independently of whether these cut right-hand sides are nonnegative.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real Gaussian network, arbitrary nonnegative node powers Pi, independent Gaussian inputs and unit-variance quantization noises on the chosen set Q; for the determinant specialization all powers equal P>0 and Q=[N].

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed through the Euclidean conditional-law and conditional-KL suppliers.

[F1]

Real scalar Gaussian multicast relay network and power constraints: Yj=∑igjiXi+Zj with independent unit Gaussian noises across nodes and times, measurable causal encoders, destination knowledge of its own message, and per-node expected average-square constraint Pi.

[F2]

Likelihood-ratio network coding for finite or Euclidean multicast networks: square-integrable local and packing log likelihoods, finite cut informations and finite-second-moment slack input costs imply the NNC cut inner bound in nats, with deterministic measurable encoders, pointwise input-word cost bounds, constant reconstructions, and closure.

[F3]

Conditional mutual-information chain rule and data processing for standard-Borel variables: conditional-KL chain rules and nonnegativity apply to these finite Gaussian informations; adding observations cannot decrease mutual information.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2givenconstructalgebra

Initially choose 0<Pi′<Pi when Pi>0, and set Xi=0 when Pi=0. On positive-power nodes take independent Xi∼N(0,Pi′). Use the stated reconstruction kernels. Remove constant coordinates when writing densities. The remaining joint coordinates (X,Y,Y^Q) are an invertible linear image of the independent nonconstant inputs, channel noises and quantization noises: recover inputs first, channel noises from Y−GX, and quantization noises from Y^Q−YQ. They therefore have a strictly positive nonsingular Gaussian density. Its needed marginal and conditional densities are likewise Gaussian with positive conditional covariance, so all local and reference likelihood ratios in [F2] exist measurably. Every log ratio is a constant plus a quadratic polynomial in Gaussian variables.

2.1A1F2step 1.1algebra

These log ratios are square-integrable: a quadratic polynomial squared is a finite sum of monomials of degree at most four, and Gaussian fourth moments are finite. Explicitly for a scalar N(0,v) density, integrating by parts twice gives EZ4=3v2; Gaussian coordinates have those scalar marginal laws, and E(Zi2Zj2)≤(EZi4 EZj4)1/2. The input cost ci(x)=x2 also has finite second moment 3(Pi′)2 and mean Pi′<Pi. All the Gaussian cut mutual informations are finite, as differences of finite Gaussian conditional log-density expectations. Thus every Euclidean hypothesis of [F2] holds at the positive-power nodes with slack square costs; zero-power inputs are fixed zero coordinates satisfying their constraints pointwise and need no shell constraint.

3.1A1F1F2step 2.1constructalgebra

Apply [F2] with constant time-sharing variable, converting ri=Riln⁡2. It gives precisely the first displayed strict cut inequalities at variances Pi′, since constant reconstructions may be deleted from both mutual informations. Its codes are deterministic and measurable, and every positive-power input word has empirical square cost at most a threshold strictly below Pi. Hence the expected average-power constraints in [F1] hold for the chosen deterministic code, independently of messages and selected compression indices. Zero-power nodes always send zero.

4.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Increase Pi′ to Pi simultaneously at positive-power nodes. Each mutual information in these finitely many cuts is a continuous function of the variances: its Gaussian entropy formula is a log determinant of a positive-definite conditional noise covariance plus a positive-semidefinite signal covariance. One may derive the formula directly from the Gaussian density: for positive-definite K, integration of its log density gives h(N(0,K))=12ln⁡((2πe)mdet⁡K) because the expected quadratic form is m. Conditional noise covariance is positive definite even at the limiting input variances. Therefore any tuple satisfying all strict inequalities at Pi satisfies them at Pi′ sufficiently close to Pi. Use the codes from step 3.1, already satisfying the original power constraints. This proves the full chosen-Q achievability assertion, including arbitrary zero-power nodes.

5.1F1step 4.1givenalgebra

For the target Gaussian law, conditioned on all inputs the noises at nodes in A are independent of (Yd,Y^Ac∩Q), since d∉A and channel and quantization noises are independent across nodes. Each active source-side test channel adds independent unit quantization noise to unit channel noise. Using the density entropy formula from step 4.1 gives I(YA∩Q;Y^A∩Q∣X[N],Yd,Y^Ac∩Q)=∣A∩Q∣2log⁡22=∣A∩Q∣2. Constants contribute zero. This calculation holds for every destination outside A and all choices of powers.

6.1F1F3step 4.1step 5.1givenalgebra

When Q=[N] and all powers equal P, condition on XAc. The quantized vector Y^Ac is a known translation of G(A)XA plus an independent Gaussian vector of covariance 2I. Its entropy minus the entropy of that noise, divided by ln⁡2, gives I(XA;Y^Ac∣XAc)=12log⁡2det⁡(I+P2G(A)G(A)T). By [F3], adding Yd can only increase this positive mutual-information term. Subtracting the penalty ∣A∣/2 from step 5.1 proves the sufficient determinant inequality for every destination outside every admissible cut. Step 4.1 makes all tuples satisfying this finite family of strict sufficient inequalities achievable.

7.1F1F2step 4.1step 6.1construct∎

The closure of the strict regions follows from [F2], or by selecting successively longer reliable codes for rate tuples tending to the claimed boundary points. For the all-zero tuple give every source a singleton message set, transmit zero at all nodes, and return the unique messages at every destination; error and power are both zero. This argument applies even if a sufficient cut expression is negative.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources