Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every positive-definite integral binary quadratic form is properly equivalent to a reduced form

Statement

Every positive-definite integral binary quadratic form is properly equivalent to a reduced form.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive-definite integral binary quadratic form f.

[F1]

A positive-definite form is reduced exactly when it satisfies the inequalities and boundary sign condition of Reduced positive-definite binary quadratic forms.

[L1]

If a positive-definite form is not reduced, then some properly equivalent positive-definite form has strictly smaller reduction measure (A non-reduced positive-definite form admits an equivalent positive-definite form with smaller reduction measure).

[L2]

Every nonempty subset of N has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let S be the set of reduction measures of the positive-definite forms properly equivalent to f. The set S is nonempty because it contains the measure of f, and SN.

givenconstruct
2.1

By [L2], the set S has a least element. Choose a positive-definite form g properly equivalent to f whose reduction measure is that least element.

step 1.1L2choose
3.1

If g were not reduced, [L1] would produce a properly equivalent positive-definite form h with strictly smaller reduction measure. Since h is properly equivalent to g and g is properly equivalent to f, the form h is also properly equivalent to f, so its measure lies in S, contradicting the choice of g.

step 2.1L1algebra
4.1

Therefore g is reduced, and it is properly equivalent to f by construction.

F1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources