Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Each proper-equivalence class of positive-definite integral binary quadratic forms contains exactly one reduced form

Statement

Each proper-equivalence class of positive-definite integral binary quadratic forms contains exactly one reduced form.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive-definite integral binary quadratic form f.

[L1]

Every positive-definite integral binary quadratic form is properly equivalent to a reduced form (Every positive-definite integral binary quadratic form is properly equivalent to a reduced form).

[L2]

In a reduced class, the leading coefficient is minimal among all properly equivalent forms (The leading coefficient of a reduced positive-definite form is minimal in its proper-equivalence class).

[L3]

Properly equivalent reduced forms with the same leading coefficient are equal (Properly equivalent reduced forms with the same leading coefficient are equal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the proper-equivalence class of f contains at least one reduced form.

L1
2.1

Suppose g and h are reduced forms properly equivalent to f. Then g and h are properly equivalent to each other. Applying [L2] first to g against h and then to h against g shows that their leading coefficients are equal.

L2step 1.1algebra
3.1

With equal leading coefficients, [L3] gives g=h. So the reduced representative is unique.

L3step 2.1
4.1

Existence from step 1.1 and uniqueness from step 3.1 prove the theorem.

step 1.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources