How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative norm-preserving Hahn–Banach extension over the real and complex fields
Statement
Assume HB. Let be a normed space over , any -linear subspace, and a bounded -linear functional. There exists such that and . The subspace need not be closed, and need not be complete; is allowed.
Facts & Assumptions
Under HB a real dominated functional extends with the two signed bounds (Dominated extension conditional on the relative principle).
The dual consists of bounded scalar-linear functionals, with norm (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).
A real-linear reconstructs a complex-linear with real part , and reconstructs any complex-linear functional from its real part (A complex linear functional is recovered from its real part by f(x)=u(x)-iu(ix)).
A linear subspace contains zero and is closed under addition and scalar multiplication (Linear subspace of a vector space).
Proof
Given: HB, a normed -space , a -linear subspace , and bounded .
Put . For , the vector is in the unit ball of , so ; for the same inequality holds because . Set . Then for and by the norm axioms.
Over , by the preceding estimate. The real extension theorem gives and . Thus , so and .
Over , the underlying real space of is a real linear subspace of the underlying real , because closure under complex scalars includes closure under real scalars. Let . It is real linear and . The real extension theorem gives real-linear with and .
Define . The reconstruction lemma gives complex linearity and . For , also , whence by the same lemma applied to .
If then . Otherwise set . Then and is real, so . Consequently the complex extension is bounded and .
In either field, extends . For every with , ; taking the supremum gives . Together with the upper bounds this yields . If , the bound forces ; in particular this covers and the zero space.
Source notes
Brezis Corollary 1.2, p.3 (real); Teschl Theorem 4.14 and Corollary 4.15, pp.113–114.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, §§1.1–1.2 and §1.3 evaluation paragraph (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis, Theorems 4.13–4.20 and §5.1 (2018 university-hosted copy) (standard reference, not scraped)