How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rouche's theorem in the classical strict-inequality form
Statement
Let be open, let be a closed complex contour that is null-homologous in , and let be holomorphic on . If
then and have the same weighted number of zeros with respect to .
In particular, if is the positively oriented boundary of a Jordan domain, then and have the same number of zeros inside , counted with multiplicity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open set , a closed complex contour that is null-homologous in , and holomorphic functions on satisfying on .
For a closed contour on which a meromorphic function does not vanish, the integral of is the winding number of the image contour about (The argument-principle integral is the winding number of the image cycle).
The argument principle at counts zeros of a holomorphic function with multiplicity and no pole term (The argument principle counts preimages of a target value).
If is continuous in and holomorphic in the complex parameter , then is holomorphic in (A contour integral of a jointly continuous, parameter-holomorphic integrand is holomorphic).
A winding number is an integer (The winding number of a closed contour is an integer).
Proof
Because is compact and there, the ratio has a maximum on . Choose with . Then for every complex with and every , so never vanishes on .
For fixed , the function is holomorphic on the disc by step 1.1. Therefore is holomorphic there by [L3]. For real , step 1.1 and [L1] give , and [L4] makes that an integer. Hence is an integer-valued holomorphic function on a connected open disc, so it is constant.
Since and , step 2.1 gives Applying [L2] to both sides shows that and have the same weighted zero count with respect to .
Depends on
Used by
- Small perturbations preserve the total local zero multiplicity Corollary
- The weak inequality |f-g| <= |g| does not suffice in Rouche Counterexample
- The equation eᶻ = 3z has exactly one solution in the unit disc Example
- The polynomial z⁵ + 3z + 1 has one zero in the unit disc Example
- The same polynomial has four zeros in the annulus 1 < |z| < 2 Example
- Rouche gives the standard leading-term proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. W. Howell and J. H. Mathews, Complex Analysis, §8.7, Theorem 8.7.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, §5.4, Theorem 5.4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)