How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count
Statement
Let be regular in of order . Then there are a representative of on a neighbourhood of , a radius , and a neighbourhood of such that, for every , the one-variable slice has no zero on and has exactly zeros inside , counted with multiplicity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A germ that is regular in of order .
Regularity of order means that on the central slice one has with holomorphic and (Regular holomorphic germs in the last variable).
Holomorphic functions are continuous (A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic).
If two holomorphic one-variable functions satisfy on a closed contour, they have the same number of zeros inside, counted with multiplicity (Rouche's theorem in the classical strict-inequality form).
Proof
By [L1], choose a representative on a neighbourhood of for which and . By continuity from [L2], after shrinking there is such that on . Hence the central slice has no zero on and exactly the order- zero at inside .
The compact set is contained in the domain of the chosen representative, and step 1.1 gives there. By continuity from [L2], after shrinking the -neighbourhood to some we have Then [L3] applied to the functions and shows that each nearby slice has the same zero count inside . The strict boundary inequality also makes on .
Depends on
Used by
- The power sums of the slice zeros vary holomorphically Lemma
- A nonzero holomorphic hypersurface in complex dimension at least two has no isolated points Theorem
- Riemann extension across a holomorphic hypersurface zero set Theorem
- Weierstrass division theorem Theorem
- Weierstrass preparation theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Section 6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jaap Korevaar and Jan Wiegerinck, Several Complex Variables, Section 4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)