Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite local projection of a reduced hypersurface germ

Statement

Let n≥1, let p∈Cn and let f∈OCn,p be a reduced nonzero nonunit germ. Center coordinates at p, so the germ is f~(z):=f(p+z)∈OCn,0. Then there are an invertible complex-linear change of these centered coordinates T supplied by the generic-linear-coordinate lemma, a monic Weierstrass polynomial W of some degree d≥1 in the new last variable, and a product neighbourhood V×D⊆Cn−1×C of the origin on which the zero sets agree:

Z(f~∘T)=Z(W)on V×D.

The resulting local projection in the original coordinates is transported by the affine coordinate map z↦p+Tz.

For this W on the chosen product representative, put XW:=Z(W)∩(V×D). Then:

  1. the projection π:XW→V, (z′,T)↦z′, is proper, surjective and has finite fibres;
  2. the quotient algebra On,0/(W) is a finitely generated On−1,0-module;
  3. with DW:=Disc⁡T(W), the restriction of π over V∖{DW=0} is a d-sheeted holomorphic covering.

When n=1 the base V is a point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A reduced nonzero nonunit germ f∈OCn,p with n≥1.

[F1]

Reducedness means that no irreducible germ divides f twice (Reduced holomorphic germ for a hypersurface).

[F2]

The centered germ f~(z)=f(p+z) becomes regular in the last variable of some order d after an invertible complex-linear coordinate change T (After a linear coordinate change, every nonzero germ is regular in the last variable).

[F3]

A germ regular in the last variable of order d is a unit times a Weierstrass polynomial W of degree d, which is monic with lower coefficients vanishing at the origin (Weierstrass preparation theorem, Weierstrass polynomials in the last variable).

[F4]

A unit of the germ ring is exactly a germ with nonzero value at the origin, so a unit has no zeros on a sufficiently small neighbourhood (A germ is a unit exactly when its value at 0 is nonzero, so Om,0 is local).

[F5]

A germ regular in the last variable of order d has a representative and radii such that, over a neighbourhood V of the origin, every slice has no zero on ∣ζ∣=r and exactly d zeros in ∣ζ∣<r, counted with multiplicity (Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count).

[F6]

The quotient On,0/(W) of a degree-d Weierstrass polynomial is generated as an On−1,0-module by the classes of 1,T,…,Td−1 (A quotient by a Weierstrass polynomial is a finite module over the smaller germ ring).

[F7]

If W(z0′,⋅) has a simple zero τ at a base point z0′, then near (z0′,τ) the zero set of W is the graph of the unique holomorphic solution supplied by the implicit function theorem, since ∂TW(z0′,τ)≠0 (The holomorphic implicit function theorem).

[F8]

If f is reduced and regular of order d, then the prepared W is square-free over K=Frac⁡(On−1,0) and DW=Disc⁡T(W) is a nonzero base germ (Reduced preparation has nonzero discriminant).

[F9]

The discriminant is a coefficient expression, and for a monic one-variable polynomial it vanishes exactly when the polynomial has a repeated root (The discriminant of a monic polynomial as the coefficient expression of Δn2, The discriminant is ∏i<j(αi−αj)2 and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root).

[F10]

A monic polynomial of degree d≥1 over C has exactly d roots counted with multiplicity, so it has at most d distinct roots (A complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity).

[F11]

A covering map has fibres whose points lie in pairwise disjoint sheets mapped homeomorphically onto evenly covered open sets (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).

Proof technique: direct — prepare in generic coordinates, shrink by the stable slice count, and read properness, finiteness and the unramified covering off the monic model.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F4

Center at p by writing f~(z)=f(p+z). By [F2] choose an invertible complex-linear map T with f~∘T regular in the last variable of order d, and by [F3] prepare f~∘T=uW with W a Weierstrass polynomial of degree d. Since f is a nonunit, d>0. Shrinking to a neighbourhood on which u has no zeros, which [F4] permits, gives Z(f~∘T)=Z(W) there; the map z↦p+Tz transports this local model to the original germ.

2.1step 1.1F5

Apply [F5] to W and shrink further: there are a base polydisc V about 0∈Cn−1 and a radius r>0 such that for every z′∈V the slice T↦W(z′,T) has no zero on ∣T∣=r and exactly d zeros in D={T:∣T∣<r}, counted with multiplicity.

2.2step 1.1F6

By [F6], the classes of 1,T,…,Td−1 generate On,0/(W) as an On−1,0-module, so this quotient is finite.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F10

The projection π:Z(W)∩(V×D)→V is surjective: for each z′∈V, the slice W(z′,⋅) is monic of degree d≥1, hence has a root by [F10], and all its roots lie in D by step 2.1. Each fibre is finite, with at most d points by [F10].

3.2step 2.1F7F9choose

Let z0′∈V with DW(z0′)≠0. By [F9], W(z0′,⋅) has d distinct roots τ1,…,τd, each simple. For each root [F7] gives a local holomorphic graph T=φk(z′) with φk(z0′)=τk. Intersecting the finitely many base neighbourhoods and shrinking so the differences φk−φl remain nonzero gives a common neighbourhood U on which the graphs are defined and pairwise disjoint.

3.3step 2.1F10

For compact K⊆V, let EK:={(z′,T)∈K×D‾:W(z′,T)=0}. Continuity of W makes EK closed in the compact set K×D‾. By step 2.1 no slice has a zero on ∂D, so EK=π−1(K) for π:Z(W)∩(V×D)→V. Therefore π−1(K) is compact and π is proper.

4.1step 3.2F10

For z′∈U the degree-d polynomial W(z′,⋅) vanishes at the d distinct points φ1(z′),…,φd(z′) from step 3.2, so these are all its roots by [F10]. Thus π−1(U)=⋃k=1d{(z′,φk(z′)):z′∈U} is a disjoint union of graphs, each mapped biholomorphically onto U.

5.1step 4.1F8F9F11

By [F8] the discriminant is not the zero germ, and by [F9] its complement is exactly the set of base points with distinct roots. For each such point step 4.1 gives a neighbourhood with d disjoint sheets, so the restriction of π over V∖{DW=0} is a d-sheeted holomorphic covering as defined in [F11].

6.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.3F8F9F11∎

If n=1, the base V is a point. Steps 3.1 and 3.3 give surjectivity, finite fibres and properness; step 2.2 gives the finite quotient module. By [F8] and [F9] the reduced one-variable polynomial has nonzero discriminant and therefore d distinct roots, so its finite zero set is a d-sheeted covering of the point.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources