Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The vanishing ideal of a reduced hypersurface germ is principal

Statement

Let n≥1, let p∈Cn and let f∈OCn,p be a reduced nonzero nonunit. Write Z(f) for the zero set germ of f at p and set

Ip(Z(f)):={h∈OCn,p: h vanishes on the zero set of f near p},

where h vanishes on the zero set of f near p when some representative of h vanishes at every point of the zero set of some representative of f on a common neighbourhood of p. Then Ip(Z(f)) is an ideal of the germ ring and

Ip(Z(f))=(f).

More generally, for an arbitrary nonzero nonunit germ g with square-free reduction gred,

Ip(Z(g))=(gred).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A reduced nonzero nonunit germ f at p, and the ideal Ip(Z(f)) of germs vanishing on its zero set near p.

[F1]

The square-free reduction gred=q1⋯qr of a nonzero nonunit g is reduced, its associate class depends only on g, and Z(gred)=Z(g) on a common neighbourhood of p (Square-free reduction of a holomorphic equation).

[F2]

Center at p and choose the invertible complex-linear map T and product representative of the finite-projection theorem. With Φ(z)=p+Tz, the germ f∘Φ is regular of order d≥1 and equals uW for a unit u and a degree-d Weierstrass polynomial W; their zero sets coincide on that representative (After a linear coordinate change, every nonzero germ is regular in the last variable, Weierstrass preparation theorem, Finite local projection of a reduced hypersurface germ).

[F3]

Units have nonzero value at the base point, so (f∘Φ)=(W) and their zero germs agree (A germ is a unit exactly when its value at 0 is nonzero, so Om,0 is local).

[F4]

Weierstrass division: every h∈On,0 is uniquely qW+r0+r1T+⋯+rd−1Td−1 with q∈On,0 and coefficients rj∈On−1,0 (Weierstrass division theorem).

[F5]

The prepared W of the reduced germ f is square-free over K=Frac⁡(On−1,0) and its discriminant DW=Disc⁡T(W) is a nonzero base germ; DW(z′)=0 exactly when the slice W(z′,⋅) has a repeated root (Reduced preparation has nonzero discriminant, Discriminant and branch set of a fixed Weierstrass projection, The discriminant is ∏i<j(αi−αj)2 and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root).

[F6]

A nonzero holomorphic function on a connected open set does not vanish on a nonempty open subset (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).

[F7]

A monic complex polynomial of degree d has d roots counted with multiplicity (A complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity). A nonzero polynomial of degree at most d−1 over a field has fewer than d distinct roots (A nonzero polynomial of degree n over an integral domain has at most n distinct roots).

Proof technique: direct — prepare in generic coordinates, divide by W, and force the remainder to vanish on a dense base set.

Proof

1.1givenF2F3

Choose T and Φ(z)=p+Tz with f∘Φ=uW as in [F2]. The pullback Φ∗:h↦h∘Φ is a ring isomorphism OCn,p→On,0, with inverse pullback by Φ−1. It sends (f) to (W) by [F3] and sends Ip(Z(f)) to I0(Z(W)), since Φ carries the corresponding zero germs onto each other. Hence it suffices to prove I0(Z(W))=(W).

1.2givenF4

The reverse inclusion is immediate: if h=cW then every representative of h vanishes at every point where W vanishes, so (W)⊆I0(Z(W)).

2.1step 1.1F4

Let h∈I0(Z(W)). By [F4] write h=qW+r with r=∑j<drjTj, rj∈On−1,0. Since qW vanishes on Z(W) and h does too, the remainder r=h−qW vanishes on Z(W) near the origin.

3.1step 2.1F2F5F7

Choose a common product V×{∣T∣<ρ} on which the division identity and vanishing of r on Z(W) hold. Write W=Td+∑j<daj(z′)Tj. Since aj(0)=0, shrink the connected base polydisc V until ∑j<d∣aj(z′)∣ρj−d<1. For ∣T∣≥ρ the lower terms have sum of absolute values strictly less than ∣T∣d, so no slice root lies there. For every z′∈V with DW(z′)≠0, [F5] and [F7] therefore give d distinct roots, all within the common product. The polynomial r(z′,⋅) has degree less than d and vanishes at all these roots, so [F7] makes it the zero polynomial. Thus rj(z′)=0 for every j<d.

4.1step 3.1F5F6

If n=1, the base is the single point V⊂C0 and DW is a nonzero constant, so V∖{DW=0}=V. Each rj is also a constant; step 3.1 says it vanishes at this sole point, hence rj=0. If n≥2, then V∖{DW=0} is nonempty and open: DW is a nonzero holomorphic germ, so it cannot vanish on a nonempty open subset of V, and its zero set is closed. Since each rj∈On−1,0 vanishes on this nonempty open set, [F6] gives rj=0 for every j<d. In either case r=0 and h=qW∈(W); combined with step 1.2 this gives I0(Z(W))=(W).

5.1step 1.1step 4.1F1∎

Undoing the coordinate change of step 1.1 gives Ip(Z(f))=(f) for reduced f. For an arbitrary nonzero nonunit g with square-free reduction gred, the zero germs agree on a neighbourhood and gred is reduced by [F1], so Ip(Z(g))=Ip(Z(gred))=(gred).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources