How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The vanishing ideal of a reduced hypersurface germ is principal
Statement
Let , let and let be a reduced nonzero nonunit. Write for the zero set germ of at and set
where vanishes on the zero set of near when some representative of vanishes at every point of the zero set of some representative of on a common neighbourhood of . Then is an ideal of the germ ring and
More generally, for an arbitrary nonzero nonunit germ with square-free reduction ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reduced nonzero nonunit germ at , and the ideal of germs vanishing on its zero set near .
The square-free reduction of a nonzero nonunit is reduced, its associate class depends only on , and on a common neighbourhood of (Square-free reduction of a holomorphic equation).
Center at and choose the invertible complex-linear map and product representative of the finite-projection theorem. With , the germ is regular of order and equals for a unit and a degree- Weierstrass polynomial ; their zero sets coincide on that representative (After a linear coordinate change, every nonzero germ is regular in the last variable, Weierstrass preparation theorem, Finite local projection of a reduced hypersurface germ).
Units have nonzero value at the base point, so and their zero germs agree (A germ is a unit exactly when its value at is nonzero, so is local).
Weierstrass division: every is uniquely with and coefficients (Weierstrass division theorem).
The prepared of the reduced germ is square-free over and its discriminant is a nonzero base germ; exactly when the slice has a repeated root (Reduced preparation has nonzero discriminant, Discriminant and branch set of a fixed Weierstrass projection, The discriminant is and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root).
A nonzero holomorphic function on a connected open set does not vanish on a nonempty open subset (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).
A monic complex polynomial of degree has roots counted with multiplicity (A complex polynomial of degree has exactly roots counted with multiplicity). A nonzero polynomial of degree at most over a field has fewer than distinct roots (A nonzero polynomial of degree over an integral domain has at most distinct roots).
Proof technique: direct — prepare in generic coordinates, divide by , and force the remainder to vanish on a dense base set.
Proof
Choose and with as in [F2]. The pullback is a ring isomorphism , with inverse pullback by . It sends to by [F3] and sends to , since carries the corresponding zero germs onto each other. Hence it suffices to prove .
The reverse inclusion is immediate: if then every representative of vanishes at every point where vanishes, so .
Let . By [F4] write with , . Since vanishes on and does too, the remainder vanishes on near the origin.
Choose a common product on which the division identity and vanishing of on hold. Write . Since , shrink the connected base polydisc until . For the lower terms have sum of absolute values strictly less than , so no slice root lies there. For every with , [F5] and [F7] therefore give distinct roots, all within the common product. The polynomial has degree less than and vanishes at all these roots, so [F7] makes it the zero polynomial. Thus for every .
If , the base is the single point and is a nonzero constant, so . Each is also a constant; step 3.1 says it vanishes at this sole point, hence . If , then is nonempty and open: is a nonzero holomorphic germ, so it cannot vanish on a nonempty open subset of , and its zero set is closed. Since each vanishes on this nonempty open set, [F6] gives for every . In either case and ; combined with step 1.2 this gives .
Undoing the coordinate change of step 1.1 gives for reduced . For an arbitrary nonzero nonunit with square-free reduction , the zero germs agree on a neighbourhood and is reduced by [F1], so .
Depends on
- Discriminant and branch set of a fixed Weierstrass projection
- After a linear coordinate change, every nonzero germ is regular in the last variable
- Reduced preparation has nonzero discriminant
- Square-free reduction of a holomorphic equation
- A germ is a unit exactly when its value at $0$ is nonzero, so $\mathcal O_{m,0}$ is local
- The discriminant is $\prod_{i<j}(\alpha_i-\alpha_j)^2$ and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root
- A complex polynomial of degree $n$ has exactly $n$ roots counted with multiplicity
- A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically
- A nonzero polynomial of degree $n$ over an integral domain has at most $n$ distinct roots
- Weierstrass division theorem
- Finite local projection of a reduced hypersurface germ
- Weierstrass preparation theorem
Used by
- Puiseux discs normalise a reduced plane curve germ Corollary
- Complex-analytic hypersurface germ and its reduced equation Definition
- Local Krull dimension of a hypersurface germ Definition
- Regular and singular points of an analytic hypersurface Definition
- Total quotient ring and normalisation of a reduced plane curve germ Definition
- An ordinary node has two smooth branches Example
- The coordinate axes form a reduced crossing Example
- The cusp y²=x³ has Puiseux parameter (t²,t³) Example
- The plane branch y²=x⁵ has Puiseux parameter (t²,t⁵) Example
- Convergent Puiseux parametrisation of an irreducible plane branch Theorem
- Finite unique irreducible components of a hypersurface germ Theorem
- Singular locus of a reduced analytic hypersurface Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Chapter 6 §§6.1–6.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Pierre Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, Chapter II §§2, 4 and 6 (standard reference, not scraped)