How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weierstrass division theorem
Statement
Let be a Weierstrass polynomial of degree in the variable . Then for every there exist unique germs and , meaning complex constants when , such that
Equivalently, every germ has a unique quotient and a unique remainder of -degree upon division by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A degree- Weierstrass polynomial and a germ .
A Weierstrass polynomial has central slice , hence is regular in of order (Weierstrass polynomials in the last variable).
The zero-count lemma supplies a radius and parameter neighbourhood on which for (Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count).
A one-variable contour integral is holomorphic in each complex parameter, and a locally bounded separately holomorphic function is holomorphic (A contour integral of a jointly continuous, parameter-holomorphic integrand is holomorphic, Locally bounded and separately holomorphic implies holomorphic).
The polydisc Cauchy formula specializes to the usual one-variable Cauchy formula on a disc (The iterated Cauchy integral formula on a polydisc).
A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], after shrinking representatives of and if needed there are and a neighbourhood of such that whenever and . Define As in the preparation proof, [L3] makes and holomorphic on .
For fixed and , the quotient is a polynomial in of degree at most : expand the monic polynomial in powers of and factor each difference . Therefore is itself a polynomial in of degree with coefficients holomorphic in .
Adding the two integral formulas from step 1.1 gives By [L4], the right-hand side is exactly for . Thus with .
Suppose also with . Then For each fixed , the left-hand side is a one-variable polynomial of degree divisible by the monic degree- polynomial . Hence as a polynomial, so . Then , and on the nonempty open set where one has ; [L5] forces everywhere. Therefore both quotient and remainder are unique.
Depends on
- Weierstrass polynomials in the last variable
- A contour integral of a jointly continuous, parameter-holomorphic integrand is holomorphic
- The iterated Cauchy integral formula on a polydisc
- Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count
- Locally bounded and separately holomorphic implies holomorphic
- A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Section 6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jaap Korevaar and Jan Wiegerinck, Several Complex Variables, Theorem 4.4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)