How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An ordinary node has two smooth branches
Example
In with coordinates , let
Near the origin the reduced curve is the union of the two smooth branches , whose equations are the Weierstrass polynomials for the holomorphic unit square root of with . The branches meet only at the origin, where they have distinct tangent directions , and the origin is the only singular point of near ; the germ is the ordinary node. Each branch carries the convergent parametrisation with first coordinate .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The germ and its zero germ .
Holomorphic implicit function theorem: if is holomorphic near with and , then on a product of polydiscs around the zero set of is the graph of a unique holomorphic function with (The holomorphic implicit function theorem).
A Weierstrass polynomial of degree in the last variable is monic of degree with lower coefficients in the preceding germ ring vanishing at the base point; a germ regular in the last variable of order is a unit times such a polynomial (Weierstrass polynomials in the last variable, Weierstrass preparation theorem).
If in the germ ring and is regular in the last variable, then are regular and the product of their Weierstrass polynomials is the Weierstrass polynomial of ; in particular the degrees add, so a Weierstrass polynomial of degree is not a product of two nonunits (Prepared factorizations correspond to germ factorizations).
For a reduced germ with factorisation into pairwise nonassociate irreducibles, the zero germ is , the germs are exactly the irreducible components of , pairwise distinct and pairwise incomparable, and is a reduced germ exactly when it is not divisible by the square of an irreducible; an irreducible germ is reduced (Finite unique irreducible components of a hypersurface germ, Irreducible hypersurface germs and their components, Reduced holomorphic germ for a hypersurface).
A point of a reduced hypersurface germ is regular exactly when the differential of a local reduced equation is nonzero at , equivalently exactly when the germ is a holomorphic hypersurface graph near ; for a reduced germ the vanishing ideal of is (Regular and singular points of an analytic hypersurface, The vanishing ideal of a reduced hypersurface germ is principal).
The germ ring is a unique factorisation domain: factorisations into irreducibles are unique up to order and associates, and a nonzero nonunit is reduced exactly when all exponents in its factorisation equal (The ring of holomorphic germs is a UFD, Unique factorisation domain, Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain).
Proof technique: direct — construct the unit square root with the implicit function theorem, split the equation into its two degree-one Weierstrass factors, and locate the singular point with the gradient criterion.
Verification
Apply [F1] to at the point : and , so there is a holomorphic function on a neighbourhood of with and identically. In particular is a unit of and for small.
Put , the two germs determined by the unit of step 1.1; each is a monic polynomial of degree in with coefficient in vanishing at . Each is irreducible in . Suppose with nonunits. Since is regular in of order , [F3] makes and regular with Weierstrass polynomials of positive degrees satisfying ; but has degree , while , a contradiction. The same argument applies to .
With as in step 1.1, . The two factors are Weierstrass polynomials of degree in : each is monic of degree with its coefficient lying in and vanishing at . The germ is itself a Weierstrass polynomial of degree : it is monic of degree in , its coefficients vanish at the origin, and , so it is regular in of order and is its own Weierstrass preparation by [F2].
The zero germs of and are distinct: is the graph of and is the graph of over the -coordinate. Since for small by step 1.1, the two graphs intersect exactly where , that is, only at , and for every small the values and differ; hence the two set germs at the origin are distinct, and neither is contained in the other.
The germ is reduced, and has exactly the two irreducible components and . Indeed exhibits as a product of two nonassociate irreducibles, each occurring once; by the uniqueness of factorisation in the UFD [F6], no irreducible germ divides twice, so is reduced, and the factorisation of a reduced germ into pairwise nonassociate irreducibles has all exponents one and is unique up to order and associates. Applying the decomposition statement [F4] to gives with and the two irreducible components of .
Each branch is a holomorphic hypersurface graph and carries an injective convergent parametrisation. For small, is holomorphic with for a suitable radius , since is exactly the graph ; similarly has image . Both maps are injective because their first coordinate is , and both are restrictions of the holomorphic function of step 1.1, hence convergent. Every point of each branch is therefore regular as a point of that branch by [F5]. At a point other than the origin, step 2.3 separates the two graphs, so locally equals the branch through that point and is regular there. This does not assert regularity of their union at the origin.
The origin is the only singular point of near . By step 3.1 the reduced defining germ of is , and
vanishes at the origin, so the origin is singular by [F5]. Conversely let with ; by step 3.1 the point lies on or on , and by step 2.3 that forces . If with small, then has because and ; the same computation with gives on the other branch. At such a point the other factor is nonvanishing, so is a unit times the local graph equation ; hence is a local reduced equation there. Thus every point of other than the origin is regular by [F5], and the two branches meet there with distinct tangent directions , since makes their linear parts . [step 3.1, step 3.2, F5, algebra]
Steps 2.1 to 4.1 establish the assertions: is a reduced equation of whose irreducible components are the two smooth branches described by the unit square root of ; the origin is their only intersection and the only singular point of the germ, with distinct tangent directions, so is an ordinary node; and each branch carries the convergent parametrisation with first coordinate .
Depends on
- Complex-analytic hypersurface germ and its reduced equation
- Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain
- Irreducible hypersurface germs and their components
- Reduced holomorphic germ for a hypersurface
- Regular and singular points of an analytic hypersurface
- Unique factorisation domain
- Weierstrass polynomials in the last variable
- Prepared factorizations correspond to germ factorizations
- The vanishing ideal of a reduced hypersurface germ is principal
- The ring of holomorphic germs is a UFD
- The holomorphic implicit function theorem
- Finite unique irreducible components of a hypersurface germ
- Weierstrass preparation theorem
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Chapter 6 §§6.1–6.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Pierre Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, Chapter II §§2, 4 and 6 (standard reference, not scraped)