Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The ring of holomorphic germs is a UFD

Statement

For every integer m≥1, the holomorphic germ ring Om,0 is a unique factorisation domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed dimension m≥1.

[L1]

A UFD is an integral domain in which every nonzero nonunit factors into irreducibles uniquely up to order and associates (Unique factorisation domain).

[L2]

If R is a domain, its field of fractions is Frac⁡(R), and for every field F the polynomial ring F[x] is a UFD (The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain, For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain).

[L3]

Over a UFD, primitive products stay primitive and primitive irreducibility is the same over the coefficient ring and its field of fractions (Gauss lemma over a UFD).

[L4]

Regular germs prepare to Weierstrass polynomials, and those polynomial factorizations correspond exactly to germ factorizations (Weierstrass preparation theorem, Prepared factorizations correspond to germ factorizations).

[L5]

Every nonzero germ becomes regular after a linear coordinate change, and one-variable holomorphic germs factor by zero order (After a linear coordinate change, every nonzero germ is regular in the last variable, The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).

[L7]

A holomorphic function on a connected neighbourhood that vanishes on a nonempty open subset vanishes identically (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L5L6

The proof is by induction on m. For m=1, every nonzero nonunit germ has the form z1du with d≥1 and u a unit by [L5]. Thus the only irreducible germs are the associates of z1, and every factorization is determined uniquely by the zero order. So O1,0 is a UFD.

1.2L1L2L3

Assume m>1 and that R:=Om−1,0 is a UFD. Then R is a domain by [L1], so its field of fractions K=Frac⁡(R) exists by [L2], and K[zm] is a UFD by [L2]. Using [L3], every primitive polynomial in R[zm] is irreducible there exactly when it is irreducible in K[zm], and products of primitive polynomials remain primitive. Therefore every nonzero polynomial in R[zm] factors uniquely, up to order and associates, by first factoring in K[zm] and then clearing denominators. Hence R[zm] is a UFD.

2.1step 1.2L4L5L6

Let f∈Om,0 be a nonzero nonunit. By [L5], after a complex-linear coordinate change T the pulled-back germ T∗f=f∘T is regular in zm. By [L4], write T∗f=uW with u a unit and W∈R[zm] a Weierstrass polynomial. Since R[zm] is a UFD by step 1.2, factor W=P1⋯Ps into irreducible polynomials. The correspondence in [L4] turns this into an irreducible factorization of T∗f, and applying T−1 gives an irreducible factorization of f.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2L4

For uniqueness, let f=q1⋯qt be any factorization of f into irreducible germs. Applying T∗ gives a factorization of T∗f. Since T∗f is regular, [L4] makes each T∗qj regular and gives prepared polynomials Qj∈R[zm] whose product is W. Step 1.2 gives uniqueness of the factorization of W in R[zm], so after reordering each Qj is associate to one of the Pi. Then [L4] makes the corresponding germs T∗qj associate to the prepared factor coming from Pi, and applying T−1 returns uniqueness for the original factorization of f.

4.1L1L7step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

It remains to check that Om,0 is a domain. Suppose ab=0 as germs on a connected polydisc. If a were nonzero, the set where a≠0 would be a nonempty open subset, and on it b=0; [L7] would force b=0 on the whole polydisc. Thus ab=0 implies a=0 or b=0. For m>1, steps 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1 therefore give existence, uniqueness, and the domain property required by [L1]; together with the base case in step 1.1, this completes the induction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources