Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Krull dimension of the holomorphic germ ring

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Fix n≥0 and p∈Cn. For n=0 set OC0,p:=C; for n≥1 read OCn,p through the translation convention recorded on this page. Then the Krull dimension of the germ ring is

dim⁡OCn,p=n.

For n≥1 the maximal ideal of OCn,p is generated by the n coordinate differences:

mCn,p=(z1−p1, …, zn−pn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥0 and the germ ring OCn,p of The ring of holomorphic germs at 0 and its maximal ideal, transported from the published origin case by the page's translation convention; for n=0 the ring is C.

[F1]

The germ ring On,0 is a commutative ring with identity; its distinguished ideal is mn,0={f:f(0)=0}, and O0,0=C, m0,0={0} (The ring of holomorphic germs at 0 and its maximal ideal).

[F2]

Units of On,0 are exactly the germs with nonzero value at 0, and On,0 is a local ring with maximal ideal mn,0; every proper ideal of a local ring is contained in its unique maximal ideal (A germ is a unit exactly when its value at 0 is nonzero, so Om,0 is local, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal).

[F3]

If f is holomorphic on a polydisc about 0, then on a smaller polydisc f(z)=∑αcαzα with ∣cα∣≤M∏krk−αk for some M (A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc).

[F4]

Coefficients obeying such a bound define a holomorphic function by their power series, and a function has at most one such representation (An absolutely convergent multi-indexed power series is holomorphic and differentiates termwise, The coefficients of a convergent multi-indexed power series are its derivative coefficients, hence unique).

[F5]

For m≥1 the ring Om,0 is a unique factorisation domain, hence an integral domain, and it is Noetherian (The ring of holomorphic germs is a UFD, Unique factorisation domain, The ring of holomorphic germs is Noetherian).

[F6]

A quotient R/P is an integral domain exactly when P is prime, and every maximal ideal is prime (R/P is an integral domain if and only if P is a prime ideal, Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime).

[F7]

The Krull dimension of a nonzero commutative ring is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals; C is a field (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring, C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2)).

[F8]

Assume AC. Let R be Noetherian and let I=(x1,…,xk) with k≥1; every prime ideal minimal over I has height at most k (Krull's height theorem, The Axiom of Choice).

[F9]

The height of a prime is the dimension of the localisation, ht⁡(p)=dim⁡Rp, and contraction along R→S−1R is an inclusion-preserving bijection from Spec⁡(S−1R) onto the primes of R disjoint from S (The height of a prime ideal, Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).

Proof technique: direct — compute the maximal ideal from power-series grouping, identify the coordinate quotients, and bound every prime chain by the height of the maximal ideal.

Proof

1.1givenF1F7

Suppose first that n=0. Then OC0,p=C is a field by [F1] and [F7]. A nonzero ideal of a field contains a nonzero element, which is a unit, so it is the whole ring; hence (0) is the only prime ideal, there is no strict chain of prime ideals of length ≥1, and dim⁡C=0 by [F7].

1.2givenF3F4construct

Now let n≥1, write O:=On,0 and m:=mn,0 for the origin case; the general-centre case is transported at the end. Choose a representative of f∈O on a polydisc and let f(z)=∑αcαzα be its expansion with the bound of [F3]. Group the nonzero multi-indices by their first positive coordinate and set hi(z):=∑αi≥1, αj=0 (j<i)cαzα−ei(1≤i≤n). The coefficient of zβ in hi is cβ+ei for the indices with βj=0 for j<i, so it obeys the bound ∣cβ+ei∣≤Mri−1∏krk−βk; by [F4] each hi is holomorphic on the polydisc. Every nonzero multi-index has a first positive coordinate, so it contributes to exactly one hi, and the subseries of an absolutely convergent series converge to the corresponding partial sums; hence f=f(0)+∑i=1nzihi as germs on the polydisc.

2.1step 1.2F1F2

Consequently f∈m (that is, f(0)=0) if and only if f lies in the ideal (z1,…,zn) of O. Conversely each coordinate germ zi vanishes at 0, so (z1,…,zn)⊆m. Therefore m=(z1,…,zn), an ideal generated by n elements.

2.2step 1.2F1F4construct

Fix 0≤k≤n and define φ:On−k,0→O/(z1,…,zk) on the germ of g(zk+1,…,zn) as the class of its inclusion in O. This is a well-defined unital ring homomorphism, because addition and multiplication of germs are represented pointwise and the inclusion respects them. It is surjective: expanding any F∈O as in step 1.2 and grouping the multi-indices with α1=⋯=αk=0 into a germ G of the remaining variables, [F4] makes G holomorphic while the complementary subseries is divisible by one of z1,…,zk, so F−G∈(z1,…,zk) and φ(G)=F+(z1,…,zk).

3.1step 2.2F1

The map φ of step 2.2 is injective: if φ(g)=0, then g∈(z1,…,zk) as a germ in O, so representatives on a common polydisc satisfy g(z)=∑i=1kziHi(z) there; setting z1=⋯=zk=0 kills the right-hand side, so the representative of g, which does not involve the first k variables, vanishes on a polydisc in Cn−k, which is exactly the zero germ. Hence O/(z1,…,zk)≅On−k,0.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F5F6F7

By step 3.1 each ideal (z1,…,zk) has quotient isomorphic to On−k,0. If k<n, then n−k≥1, so this quotient is an integral domain by [F5]; if k=n, it is O0,0=C, a field by [F7] and hence an integral domain. Thus every (z1,…,zk) with 0≤k≤n is prime by [F6]. In particular m=(z1,…,zn) is prime, and it is maximal by [F2].

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F5F7

The chain of prime ideals (0)⊊(z1)⊊(z1,z2)⊊⋯⊊(z1,…,zn)=m is strict: (0) is prime because O is a domain by [F5], each later term is prime by step 4.1, and zk∉(z1,…,zk−1), since otherwise its class in O/(z1,…,zk−1)≅On−k+1,0 would be zero by step 3.1, whereas that class corresponds to the first coordinate germ of On−k+1,0, which is nonzero. This chain has length n, so dim⁡O≥n.

5.2step 2.1step 4.1F5F8given

For the reverse inequality, [F5] makes O Noetherian, and by step 2.1 the prime ideal m is generated by n elements, hence is minimal over that ideal. Under AC, [F8] gives ht⁡(m)≤n.

6.1step 5.2F2F9

Every proper ideal of O is contained in m: if I⊈m, then I contains an element outside the maximal ideal, that element is a unit by [F2], and I=O. Hence the primes disjoint from S=O∖m are exactly the primes of O. By [F9], contraction is an inclusion-preserving bijection Spec⁡(Om)→Spec⁡(O) whose inverse is the inclusion-preserving prime extension P↦S−1P. Thus a strict chain of primes in O extends to a strict chain of the same length in Om, so dim⁡O≤dim⁡Om=ht⁡(m)≤n by step 5.2.

7.1step 1.1step 2.1step 5.1step 6.1given∎

Steps 5.1 and 6.1 give dim⁡On,0=n for n≥1, step 1.1 gives it for n=0, and step 2.1 identifies the maximal ideal with (z1,…,zn). Transporting along the translation convention replaces each coordinate function zi by the coordinate difference zi−pi and does not change dimensions, so dim⁡OCn,p=n and mCn,p=(z1−p1,…,zn−pn) for every n≥1 and every p∈Cn.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources